The analgesic efficacy of the continuous adductor canal block compared to continuous intravenous fentanyl infusion with a single-shot adductor canal block in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial
- Author:
Min Kyoung KIM
1
;
Hyoung Yong MOON
;
Choon Gun RYU
;
Hyun KANG
;
Han Jun LEE
;
Hwa Yong SHIN
Author Information
- Publication Type:Randomized Controlled Trial
- Keywords: Analgesia; Fentanyl; Knee replacement arthroplasty; Local anesthetics; Nausea; Opioid; Pain management; Patient controlled analgesia; Postoperative pain; Ropivacaine; Vomiting
- MeSH: Analgesia; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled; Analgesics; Analgesics, Opioid; Anesthetics, Local; Antiemetics; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee; Catheters; Fentanyl; Humans; Nausea; Pain Management; Pain, Postoperative; Postoperative Period; Quadriceps Muscle; Skin; Ultrasonography; Vomiting
- From:The Korean Journal of Pain 2019;32(1):30-38
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
- Abstract: BACKGROUND: The adductor canal block (ACB) is an effective intervention for postoperative analgesia following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, the ideal ACB regimen has not yet been established. We compared the analgesic effects between a continuous ACB group and fentanyl-based intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA) with a single-shot ACB group. METHODS: Patients who underwent TKA were randomly allocated to either a continuous ACB group (Group CACB) or IV-PCA with a single-shot ACB group (Group IVACB). Before the surgery, ultrasound guided ACB with 0.5% ropivacaine 20 cc was provided to all patients. Before skin incision, the infusion system (0.2% ropivacaine through an adductor canal catheter in group CACB vs. intravenous fentanyl in group IVACB) was connected. The postoperative pain severity; the side effects of local anesthetics and opioids; administration of rescue analgesics and anti-emetics; and sensorimotor deficits were measured. RESULTS: Postoperative pain severity was significantly higher in the IVACB group at 30 min, 4 h, 24 h, and 48 h after surgery. The averages and standard deviations (SD) of the NRS score of postoperative pain were 0.14 ± 0.37, 4.57 ± 2.37, 6.00 ± 1.63, and 4.28 ± 1.49, respectively in the IVACB group. Rescue analgesic requirements and quadriceps muscle strength were not statistically different between the groups throughout the postoperative period. Moreover, rescue antiemetic requirements were higher in group IVACB than group CACB. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the continuous ACB provided superior analgesia and fewer side effects without any significant motor deficit than the IV-PCA with a single-shot ACB.
