Physical characteristics of ceramic/glass-polymer based CAD/CAM materials: Effect of finishing and polishing techniques
10.4047/jap.2019.11.2.128
- Author:
Mugem Asli EKICI
1
;
Ferhan EGILMEZ
;
Isil CEKIC-NAGAS
;
Gulfem ERGUN
Author Information
1. Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM);
Hybrid ceramics;
Dental polishing;
Water hardness;
Water solubility
- MeSH:
Absorption;
Aluminum Oxide;
Ceramics;
Computer-Aided Design;
Dental Polishing;
Diamond;
Immersion;
Rubber;
Silicon;
Silicones;
Solubility;
Water
- From:The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics
2019;11(2):128-137
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the effect of different finishing and polishing techniques on water absorption, water solubility, and microhardness of ceramic or glass-polymer based computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) materials following thermocycling. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 150 disc-shaped specimens were prepared from three different hybrid materials and divided into five subgroups according to the applied surface polishing techniques. All specimens were subjected up to #4000 grit SiC paper grinding. No additional polishing has been done to the control group (Group I). Other polishing procedures were as follows: Group II: two-stage diamond impregnated polishing discs; Group III: yellow colored rubber based silicone discs; Group IV: diamond polishing paste; and Group V: Aluminum oxide polishing discs. Subsequently, 5000-cycles of thermocycling were applied. The analyses were conducted after 24 hours, 7 days, and 30 days of water immersion. Water absorption and water solubility results were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Tukey post-hoc tests. Besides, microhardness data were compared by Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests (P<.05). RESULTS: Surface polishing procedures had significant effects on water absorption and solubility and surface microhardness of resin ceramics (P<.05). Group IV exhibited the lowest water absorption and the highest microhardness values (P<.05). Immersion periods had no effect on the microhardness of hybrid ceramic materials (P>.05). CONCLUSION: Surface finishing and polishing procedures might negatively affect physical properties of hybrid ceramic materials. Nevertheless, immersion periods do not affect the microhardness of the materials. Final polishing by using diamond polishing paste can be recommended for all CAD/CAM materials.
