Influence of scaling procedures on the integrity of titanium nitride coated CAD/CAM abutments
10.4047/jap.2018.10.3.197
- Author:
Peter GEHRKE
1
;
Emmanouil SPANOS
;
Carsten FISCHER
;
Helmut STORCK
;
Florian TEBBEL
;
Dirk DUDDECK
Author Information
1. Private Practice, Ludwigshafen, Germany. dr-gehrke@prof-dhom.de
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Titanium nitride;
Abutments;
Scaling;
Surface roughness;
Scanning electron microscopy
- MeSH:
In Vitro Techniques;
Microscopy, Electron, Scanning;
Steel;
Tin;
Titanium;
Ultrasonics
- From:The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics
2018;10(3):197-204
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: To determine the extent of treatment traces, the roughness depth, and the quantity of titanium nitride (TiN) removed from the surface of CAD/CAM abutments after treatment with various instruments. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twelve TiN coated CAD/CAM abutments were investigated for an in vitro study. In the test group (9), each abutment surface was subjected twice (150 g vs. 200 g pressure) to standardized treatment in a simulated prophylaxis measure with the following instruments: acrylic scaler, titanium curette, and ultrasonic scaler with steel tip. Three abutments were used as control group. Average surface roughness (Sa) and developed interfacial area ratio (Sdr) of treated and untreated surfaces were measured with a profilometer. The extent of treatment traces were analyzed by scanning electron microscopy. RESULTS: Manipulation with ultrasonic scalers resulted in a significant increase of average surface roughness (Sa, P < .05) and developed interfacial area ratio (Sdr, P < .018). Variable contact pressure did not yield any statistically significant difference on Sa-values for all instruments (P=.8). Ultrasonic treatment resulted in pronounced surface traces and partially detachment of the TiN coating. While titanium curettes caused predominantly moderate treatment traces, no traces or detectable substance removal has been determined after manipulation with acrylic curettes. CONCLUSION: Inappropriate instruments during regular plaque control may have an adverse effect on the integrity of the TiN coating of CAD/CAM abutments. To prevent defects and an increased surface roughness at the transmucosal zone of TiN abutments, only acrylic scaling instruments can be recommended for regular maintenance care.
