A Multicenter Survey on the Current Status of Pediatric Blood Cultures in Korea
10.14776/piv.2018.25.1.17
- Author:
Young Joon LEE
1
;
Ji Young LEE
;
Seom Kim KONG
;
Gyu Min YEON
;
Yoo Rha HONG
;
Chi Eun OH
Author Information
1. Department of Pediatrics, Kosin University Gospel Hospital, Kosin University College of Medicine, Busan, the Republic of Korea. chieunoh@kosin.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Multicenter Study
- Keywords:
Blood culture;
Infant, newborn;
Child;
Quality control;
Surveys and questionnaires
- MeSH:
Bacteremia;
Child;
Communicable Diseases;
Hospitals, General;
Humans;
Infant, Newborn;
Intensive Care, Neonatal;
Korea;
Methods;
Povidone-Iodine;
Quality Control;
Skin;
Specialization;
Surveys and Questionnaires
- From:Pediatric Infection & Vaccine
2018;25(1):17-25
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: Blood culture is an essential diagnostic tool and requires clear indications, proper techniques, and quality control. We aimed to investigate whether blood cultures in children are appropriate for indications, are performed correctly, and receive proper quality control. METHODS: We conducted an online survey targeting pediatric infectious diseases (ID) specialists working in general hospitals and neonatologists (Neo) working at hospitals operating a neonatal intensive care unit in Korea. RESULTS: Approximately 81.1% (30/37) of pediatric ID specialists and 72.2% (52/72) of Neo responded to the survey. Some of the respondents (33.3% of ID and 59.6% of Neo) performed blood culture as a regular test irrespective of the indication. Approximately 40% of ID and 65.4% of Neo ordered only one set of blood culture in patients suspected with bacteremia. The most commonly used disinfectant for skin preparation was povidone-iodine, while the skin preparation method varied by institution. Approximately two-thirds of the institutions were monitoring the blood culture contamination rate, whereas relatively few provided staff with feedback on that rate. In addition, less than half of the institutions were providing regular staff training on blood culture (40% of ID and 28.8% of Neo). CONCLUSIONS: The indication and methods of blood culture for children varied according to institution, and few hospitals exert effort in improving the quality of blood culture. Institutions have to strive constantly toward improvement of blood culture quality and evidence-based recommendations for pediatric blood cultures should be standardized.
