The Performance of the Agility System for Interferon Gamma Release Assay Using QuantiFERON TB Gold In-Tube Assay
10.15263/jlmqa.2019.41.1.29
- Author:
Kwanghyuk SEOK
1
;
Soyoun SHIN
Author Information
1. Laboratory Medicine Center, The Korean Institute of Tuberculosis, Cheongju, Korea. leukoso@naver.com
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Agility;
Interferon gamma release assays;
Latent tuberculosis infection;
QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube
- MeSH:
Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay;
Interferon-gamma Release Tests;
Interferons;
Latent Tuberculosis;
Mass Screening;
Methods;
Plasma
- From:Journal of Laboratory Medicine and Quality Assurance
2019;41(1):29-38
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: As stated in ‘The Action Strategy for Tuberculosis-Free Korea,’ last March, high-throughput, large-scale analytical instruments for interferon gamma release assays (IGRA) are demanded by many clinical laboratories using the QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube assay (Cellestis/Qiagen, Australia). Agility (Dynex Technologies, USA) is an automated high-throughput enzyme linked immunosorbent assay analyser. The present study aimed to evaluate its accuracy and speed. METHODS: Pooled plasma was prepared using samples obtained after IGRA testing. Analyses of precision, linearity, cut-off evaluation, and comparison with conventional methods were performed for multiple Agility instruments according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute EP5-A3, EP6-A, EP9-A3 and EP12-A2 guidelines. The turnaround time and throughput were also analysed. RESULTS: The coefficient of variation range was 2.48%–4.0%, 7.01%–11.17%, and 9.69%–14.84% for the repeatability, between-run precision, and between-day precision analyses, respectively. The linearity ranged from 0 to 10.541. Comparison analysis presented a high concordance of Agility with the conventional instrument, DS2 (Dynex Technologies), and manual method for IGRA. The cut-off value of 0.35 IU/mL was well compatible with the C50. It was identified that the C50±20% contained the C5–C95 interval. The average turnaround time was 3.84 hours, from the submission of pre-treated samples to the reporting of results. The throughput was determined to be 290 tests during a routine working time of 8 hours. CONCLUSIONS: Agility showed high precision, linearity, concordance, and had a 2.5 times faster throughput than with the conventional and manual method. It could be useful for large-scale IGRA testing in latent tuberculosis infection screening project. Samples within C50±20% are suspected to show relatively low reporducible results of high inversion between postivie and negative.
