Analysis of the Participation Reasons and Deterrents on Welfare Facility Dietitians for the Elderly
10.5720/kjcn.2019.24.2.127
- Author:
Su Jin KIM
1
;
Min A LEE
;
Wookyoun CHO
;
Youngmee LEE
;
Jiyoung CHOI
;
Eunju PARK
Author Information
1. Department of Food and Nutrition, Kookmin University, Seoul, Korea, Student.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
dietitian;
reasons of participation;
deterrents of participation;
welfare facility for the elderly
- MeSH:
Aged;
Education;
Humans;
Korea;
Motivation;
Nutritionists
- From:Korean Journal of Community Nutrition
2019;24(2):127-136
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVES: This study analyzed the education participation reasons and deterrents of dietitians who work in welfare facilities for the elderly. METHODS: The survey was completed by 144 dietitians working at welfare facilities for the elderly in Korea. The survey was conducted in October, 2018, both on-line and off-line, based on the demographic characteristics, work status on welfare facilities for the elderly, Participation Reasons Scale (PRS) and Deterrents to Participation Scale (DPS-G). The data were analyzed using frequency analysis, descriptive analysis, factor analysis, reliability analysis, regressive analysis using SPSS ver. 25.0. RESULTS: The reason for participation were divided into three factors: ‘Responsibility of professional and self-development (5.76 ± 1.04)’, ‘Job stability and personal benefits (4.98 ± 1.28)’, and ‘Interaction and development of professional competencies (5.85 ± 1.00)’. ‘Interaction and development of professional competencies’ was the highest motivation factor. Also, the deterrents for participation were divided into four factors: ‘Dispositional barrier (2.70 ± 1.29)’, ‘Dissatisfaction of education usability (3.39 ± 1.38)’, ‘Institutional barrier (4.21 ± 1.45)’, and ‘Situational barrier (2.36 ± 1.30)’. ‘Institutional barrier’ showed the highest deterrents factor. In addition, ‘Responsibility of professional and self-development’ and ‘Interaction and development of professional competencies’ were negative attributes for ‘Dispositional barrier’ (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: These results provide basic data to promote participation in education and contribute to the improvement of their job ability and education capacity of the food and nutrition management of welfare facilities for the elderly
