Regional Brain Activity During Rest and Gastric Water Load in Subtypes of Functional Dyspepsia: A Preliminary Brain Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study
- Author:
Yanwen CHEN
1
;
Ruifeng WANG
;
Bo HOU
;
Feng FENG
;
Xiucai FANG
;
Liming ZHU
;
Xiaohong SUN
;
Zhifeng WANG
;
Meiyun KE
Author Information
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords: Dyspepsia; Epigastric pain syndrome; Functional neuroimaging; Post-prandial distress syndrome; Regional homogeneity
- MeSH: Brain; Broca Area; Caudate Nucleus; Classification; Dyspepsia; Functional Neuroimaging; Healthy Volunteers; Humans; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Parahippocampal Gyrus; Parietal Lobe; Perfusion; Prefrontal Cortex; Sensation; Somatosensory Cortex; Visceral Pain; Water
- From:Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility 2018;24(2):268-279
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
- Abstract: BACKGROUND/AIMS: Functional dyspepsia (FD) remains a great clinical challenge since the FD subtypes, defined by Rome III classification, still have heterogeneous pathogenesis. Previous studies have shown notable differences in visceral sensation processing in the CNS in FD compared to healthy subjects (HS). However, the role of CNS in the pathogenesis of each FD subtype has not been recognized. METHODS: Twenty-eight FD patients, including 10 epigastric pain syndrome (EPS), 9 postprandial distress syndrome (PDS), and 9 mixed-type, and 10 HS, were enrolled. All subjects underwent a proximal gastric perfusion water load test and the regional brain activities during resting state and water load test were investigated by functional magnetic resonance imaging. RESULTS: For regional brain activities during the resting state and water load test, each FD subtype was significantly different from HS (P < 0.05). Focusing on EPS and PDS, the regional brain activities of EPS were stronger than PDS in the left paracentral lobule, right inferior frontal gyrus pars opercularis, postcentral gyrus, precuneus, insula, parahippocampal gyrus, caudate nucleus, and bilateral cingulate cortices at the resting state (P < 0.05), and stronger than PDS in the left inferior temporal and fusiform gyri during the water load test (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to HS, FD subtypes had different regional brain activities at rest and during water load test, whereby the differences displayed distinct manifestations for each subtype. Compared to PDS, EPS presented more significant differences from HS at rest, suggesting that the abnormality of central visceral pain processing could be one of the main pathogenesis mechanisms for EPS.
