Differences between the Molecular Mechanisms Underlying Ruptured and Non-Ruptured Carotid Plaques, and the Significance of ABCA1
- Author:
Sung Hyuk HEO
1
;
Eun Hye LEE
;
Hyun Hee PARK
;
Bum Joon KIM
;
Hyo Chul YOUN
;
Young Seo KIM
;
Hyun Young KIM
;
Seong Ho KOH
;
Dae Il CHANG
Author Information
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords: Carotid arteries; Plaque; ABCA1; Rupture; Proteomics; Biomarkers
- MeSH: Biomarkers; Carotid Arteries; Early Diagnosis; Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay; Humans; Immunohistochemistry; Polymerase Chain Reaction; Proteomics; Risk Factors; RNA, Messenger; Rupture; Stroke
- From:Journal of Stroke 2018;20(1):80-91
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
- Abstract: BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Carotid plaques are a strong risk factor for ischemic stroke, and plaque rupture poses an even higher risk. Although many studies have investigated the pathogenic mechanisms of carotid plaque formation, few have studied the differences in molecular mechanisms underlying the rupture and non-rupture of carotid plaques. In addition, since early diagnosis and treatment of carotid plaque rupture are critical for the prevention of ischemic stroke, many studies have sought to identify the important target molecules involved in the rupture. However, a target molecule critical in symptomatic ruptured plaques is yet to be identified. METHODS: A total of 79 carotid plaques were consecutively collected, and microscopically divided into ruptured and non-ruptured groups. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction array, proteomics, and immunohistochemistry were performed to compare the differences in molecular mechanisms between ruptured and non-ruptured plaques. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was used to measure the differences in ATP-binding cassette subfamily A member 1 (ABCA1) levels in the serum. RESULTS: The expression of several mRNAs and proteins, including ABCA1, was higher in ruptured plaques than non-ruptured plaques. In contrast, the expression of other proteins, including β-actin, was lower in ruptured plaques than non-ruptured plaques. The increased expression of ABCA1 was consistent across several experiments, ABCA1 was positive only in the serum of patients with symptomatic ruptured plaques. CONCLUSIONS: This study introduces a plausible molecular mechanism underlying carotid plaque rupture, suggesting that ABCA1 plays a role in symptomatic rupture. Further study of ABCA1 is needed to confirm this hypothesis.
