A novel classification of anterior alveolar arch forms and alveolar bone thickness: A cone-beam computed tomography study
10.5624/isd.2018.48.3.191
- Author:
Atcharee BULYALERT
1
;
Atiphan PIMKHAOKHAM
Author Information
1. Esthetic Restorative and Implant Dentistry Program, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand. atiphan.p@chula.ac.th
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Alveolar Process;
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
- MeSH:
Alveolar Process;
Classification;
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography;
Tooth;
Tooth Cervix
- From:Imaging Science in Dentistry
2018;48(3):191-199
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: This study classified alveolar arch forms and evaluated differences in alveolar bone thickness among arch forms in the anterior esthetic region using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Axial views of 113 CBCT images were assessed at the level of 3 mm below the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) of the right and left canines. The root center points of teeth in the anterior esthetic region were used as reference points. Arch forms were classified according to their transverse dimensions and the intercanine width-to-depth ratio. The buccolingual alveolar bone thickness of each tooth was measured at 3 mm below the CEJ and at the mid-root level. Differences in the mean thicknesses among arch forms were analyzed. RESULTS: Anterior maxillary arches could be classified as long narrow, short medium, long medium, and long wide arches. Significant differences in buccolingual alveolar bone thickness among the arch groups were found at both levels. The long wide arches presented the greatest bone thickness, followed by the long medium arches, while the long narrow and short medium arches were the thinnest. CONCLUSION: Arch forms were classified as long narrow, short medium, long medium, and long wide. The buccolingual alveolar bone thickness exhibited significant differences among the arch forms.
