Update on Bone-Conduction Auditory Brainstem Responses: A Review
- Author:
Young Joon SEO
1
;
Chanbeom KWAK
;
Saea KIM
;
Yoon Ah PARK
;
Kyoung Ho PARK
;
Woojae HAN
Author Information
- Publication Type:Review
- Keywords: Bone-conduction auditory brainstem response; Bone oscillator; Atresia
- MeSH: Adult; Brain Stem; Child; Ear Canal; Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem; Hearing; Hearing Loss; Humans; Infant; Nervous System Diseases; Pathology
- From:Journal of Audiology & Otology 2018;22(2):53-58
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
- Abstract: Auditory brainstem responses (ABR) have been used as a powerful and the most common objective tool to evaluate hearing sensitivity and to diagnose the types of hearing loss and neurological disorders, through the auditory peripheral pathway to a central level of the brainstem, since 1971. Although bone-conduction (BC) ABR could be an alternative to air-conduction (AC) ABR, as the former overcomes some limitations of the latter, the majority of clinicians rarely utilize it due to a lack of knowledge and no routine test administration. This review presents the weaknesses of AC ABR that apply to all clinical population, and discusses the development of BC ABR. The optimal placements of bone oscillators to obtain favorable clinical outcomes in infants, children, and adults, and the appropriate stimuli for BC ABR are examined. While providing absolute thresholds and latencies of BC ABR based on previous studies compared to AC ABR, this review includes clinical data of infants and young children with both normal hearing in terms of maturation, and with pathology such as congenital external auditory canal atresia. We recommend the future clinical application of BC ABR for candidacy as well as for patients with BC hearing implants.
