Factors Affecting the Insured Organizations Participation in Decision Making Process in Health Insurance Policy Committee
10.4332/KJHPA.2017.27.4.335
- Author:
Joo Sung HAN
1
;
Chang Yup KIM
Author Information
1. Graduate School of Public Health, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea. cykim@snu.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Health Insurance Policy Committee;
The insured;
Public participation;
Participation in policy making process;
In-depth interview
- MeSH:
Consumer Participation;
Decision Making;
Delivery of Health Care;
Democracy;
Insurance, Health;
Learning;
Negotiating;
Policy Making;
Social Responsibility
- From:Health Policy and Management
2017;27(4):335-345
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: Due to the asymmetry of information and knowledge and the power of bureaucrats and medical professionals, it is not easy for citizens to participate in health care policy making. This study analyzes the case of the insured organization participating in the Health Insurance Policy Committee (HIPC) and provides a basis for discussing methods and conditions for better public participation. METHODS: Qualitative analysis was conducted using the in-depth interviews with the participants and document data such as materials for HIPC meetings. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with purposively sampled six participants from organizations representing the insured in HIPC. The meanings related to the factors affecting participation were found and categorized into major categories. RESULTS: The main factors affecting participating in the decision making process were trust and cooperation among the participants, structure and procedure of governance, representation and expertise of participants, and contents of issues. Due to limited cooperation, participants lacked influence in important decisions. There was an imbalance in power due to unreasonable procedures and criteria for governance. As the materials for meetings were provided inappropriate manner, it was difficult for participants to understand the contents and comments on the meeting. Due to weak accountability structure, opinions from external stakeholders have not been well received. The participation was made depending on the expertise of individual members. The degree of influence was different depending on the contents of the issues. CONCLUSION: In order to meet the values of democracy and realize the participation that the insured can demonstrate influence, it is necessary to have a fair and reasonable procedure and a sufficient learning environment. More deliberative structure which reflects citizen's public perspective is required, rather than current negotiating structure of HIPC.
