Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version Scale of the Clinical Learning Environment, Supervision and Nurse Teacher Evaluation Scale (CLES+T)
10.4040/jkan.2018.48.1.70
- Author:
Sun Hee KIM
1
;
So Yeon YOO
;
Yae Young KIM
Author Information
1. Department of Nursing, Daegu Catholic University, Daegu, Korea.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Environment;
Learning;
Nursing students;
Preceptorship;
Validity and reliability
- MeSH:
Humans;
Learning;
Nursing;
Organization and Administration;
Preceptorship;
Reproducibility of Results;
Statistics as Topic;
Students, Nursing
- From:Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing
2018;48(1):70-84
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: This study was conducted to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Korean version of the clinical learning environment, supervision and nurse teacher evaluation scale (CLES+T) that measures the clinical learning environment and the conditions associated with supervision and nurse teachers. METHODS: The English CLES+T was translated into Korean with forward and back translation. Survey data were collected from 434 nursing students who had more than four days of clinical practice in Korean hospitals. Internal consistency reliability and construct validity using confirmatory and exploratory factor analysis were conducted. SPSS 20.0 and AMOS 22.0 programs were used for data analysis. RESULTS: The exploratory factor analysis revealed seven factors for the thirty three-item scale. Confirmatory factor analysis supported good convergent and discriminant validities. The Cronbach's alpha for the overall scale was .94 and for the seven subscales ranged from .78 to .94. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that the 33-items Korean CLES+T is an appropriate instrument to measure Korean nursing students'clinical learning environment with good validity and reliability.
