Comparison of Characteristics of Streptococcus dysgalactiae subsp. equisimilis Isolates Causing Repetitive vs Single Infections
10.3343/alm.2019.39.5.488
- Author:
Tomohiro FUJITA
1
;
Haruno YOSHIDA
;
Shunsuke OSAKA
;
Yoneji HIROSE
;
Mieko GOTO
;
Noriyuki NAGANO
;
Takashi TAKAHASHI
Author Information
1. Department of Clinical Laboratory, Kitasato University Medical Center, Saitama, Japan.
- Publication Type:Brief Communication
- Keywords:
Streptococcus dysgalactiae subsp. equisimilis;
Recurrence;
Reinfection
- MeSH:
Biofilms;
DNA;
Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field;
Humans;
Medical Records;
Multilocus Sequence Typing;
Phenotype;
Recurrence;
Streptococcus;
Virulence
- From:Annals of Laboratory Medicine
2019;39(5):488-492
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
No study has described Streptococcus dysgalactiae subsp. equisimilis (SDSE) isolates that cause repetitive infections (recurrence and reinfection). We compared the microbiological characteristics of SDSE causing repetitive infections with those causing single infections. Three patients with invasive infections were identified based on their medical records, and multiple SDSE isolates were collected at intervals over three weeks, using a laboratory repository. Isolates from 12 patients with single-episode infections served as controls. Six isolates were collected from three patients with first and second episodes of infection. All isolates causing either repetitive or single-episode infection were subjected to emm typing, multilocus sequence typing (MLST), pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), and random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analyses. Amplification of five virulence genes (sicG, prtF1, prtF2, lmb, and cbp), biofilm formation (BF), and cell invasion abilities (CIAs) were measured as virulent phenotypes. We observed close genetic similarities in the data obtained by emm typing, MLST, PFGE, and RAPD in four isolates from two patients, suggesting recurrence, whereas two isolates from one patient indicated genetic differences in these data, suggesting re-infection. The presence of the five virulence genes and the BF and CIA measurements appeared not to contribute to repetitive infections, compared with isolates causing single-episode infection. In conclusion, clinicians encountering patients with repetitive infections should be aware of both possibilities: recurrence with closely related strains and reinfection with different strains.
