Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization as the First-line Investigation for Neonates with Congenital Heart Disease: Experience in a Single Tertiary Center
- Author:
Bo Geum CHOI
1
;
Su Kyung HWANG
;
Jung Eun KWON
;
Yeo Hyang KIM
Author Information
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords: Array comparative genomic hybridization; Heart defects, congenital; Neonate
- MeSH: Ambulatory Care Facilities; Comparative Genomic Hybridization; Diagnosis; DiGeorge Syndrome; Early Diagnosis; Echocardiography; Epilepsy; Exome; Heart Defects, Congenital; Humans; In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence; Infant, Newborn; Mass Screening; Noonan Syndrome; Parents; Prognosis; Pulmonary Artery; Rehabilitation; Williams Syndrome
- From:Korean Circulation Journal 2018;48(3):209-216
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
- Abstract: BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the present study was to investigate the advantages and disadvantages of verifying genetic abnormalities using array comparative genomic hybridization (a-CGH) immediately after diagnosis of congenital heart disease (CHD). METHODS: Among neonates under the age of 28 days who underwent echocardiography from January 1, 2014 to April 30, 2016, neonates whose chromosomal and genomic abnormalities were tested using a-CGH in cases of an abnormal finding on echocardiography were enrolled. RESULTS: Of the 166 patients diagnosed with CHD, 81 underwent a-CGH and 11 patients (11/81, 13.5%) had abnormal findings on a-CGH. 22q11.2 deletion syndrome was the most common (4/11, 36.4%). On the first a-CGH, 4 patients were negative (4/81, 5%). Three of them were finally diagnosed with Williams syndrome using fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), 1 patient was diagnosed with Noonan syndrome through exome sequencing. All of them exhibited diffuse pulmonary artery branch hypoplasia, as well as increased velocity of blood flow, on repeated echocardiography. Five patients started rehabilitation therapy at mean 6 months old age in outpatient clinics and epilepsy was diagnosed in 2 patients. Parents of 2 patients (22q11.2 deletion syndrome and Patau syndrome) refused treatment due to the anticipated prognosis. CONCLUSIONS: Screening tests for genetic abnormalities using a-CGH in neonates with CHD has the advantage of early diagnosis of genetic abnormality during the neonatal period in which there is no obvious symptom of genetic abnormality. However, there are disadvantages that some genetic abnormalities cannot be identified on a-CGH.
