Diagnostic accuracy of line probe assays for drug-resistant tuberculosis: a Meta-analysis.
10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-6450.2018.11.014
- VernacularTitle:线性探针技术诊断耐药肺结核准确性的Meta分析
- Author:
L XU
1
;
Y X SUN
;
S Y ZHAN
Author Information
1. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China.
- Publication Type:Meta-Analysis
- Keywords:
Drug-resistant tuberculosis;
Line probe assays;
Meta-analysis
- MeSH:
Antitubercular Agents/therapeutic use*;
Biological Assay/methods*;
China;
Humans;
Isoniazid/pharmacology*;
Microbial Sensitivity Tests/methods*;
Mycobacterium tuberculosis/isolation & purification*;
Rifampin/pharmacology*;
Sensitivity and Specificity;
Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant/drug therapy*
- From:
Chinese Journal of Epidemiology
2018;39(11):1491-1495
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of line probe assays for drug- resistant tuberculosis (TB) in China. Methods: Chinese databases (CNKI, Wanfang, SinoMed, VIP Information) and English databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library) were used to retrieve the literatures regarding the accuracy of line probe assays in the diagnosis of drug-resistant tuberculosis in China between January 1, 2000 and September 1, 2017. Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 was used to evaluate the quality of the included studies. Sensitivity and specificity in different studies (using drug sensitivity test or gene sequencing as gold standard) were combined by Meta-analysis using bivariate or univariate model. In addition, subgroup analysis (GenoType MTBDRplus, GenoType MTBDRsl and Reverse dot blot hybridization) and sensitivity analysis were also carried out. Results: A total of 24 literatures involving 82 studies were included in the final analysis. The sensitivity and specificity of line probe assays for rifampicin resistant TB were 0.91(0.88-0.94) and 0.98 (0.97-0.99), respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of line probe assays for isoniazid resistant TB were 0.80 (0.77-0.83) and 0.98 (0.96-0.99), respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of line probe assays for multidrug-resistant TB were 0.81 (0.76-0.85) and 0.99 (0.99-1.00), respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of line probe assays for quinolone resistant TB were 0.92(0.88-0.95) and 0.94 (0.91-0.97), respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of line probe assays for second-line injectable drug resistant TB (including kanamycin, Capreomycin, amikacin) were 0.79(0.58-0.91) and 0.98 (0.90-1.00), respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of line probe assays for extensively drug-resistant TB were 0.46 (0.19-0.75) and 1.00 (0.98-1.00), respectively. Subgroup analysis showed that the overall diagnostic accuracy of GenoType MTBDRplus and GenoType MTBDRsl was higher than that of Reverse dot blot hybridization. According to the results of sensitivity analysis, the results of this study were robust. Conclusion: The diagnostic accuracy of line probe assays for drug-resistant TB is high.
