Study on the overall implementation status of the National Demonstration Areas for Comprehensive Prevention and Control of Non-communicable Diseases.
10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-6450.2018.04.006
- Author:
J J LI
1
;
J L LI
;
J ZHANG
;
R R JIN
;
S MA
;
G J DENG
;
X W SU
;
F BIAN
;
Y M QU
;
L L HU
;
Y JIANG
Author Information
1. School of Public Health, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Chronic disease control and prevention;
Establishment;
Implementation situation;
National Demonstration Areas for Comprehensive Prevention and Control of Non-communicable Diseases
- MeSH:
China/epidemiology*;
Chronic Disease/epidemiology*;
Delivery of Health Care;
Health Promotion/organization & administration*;
Humans;
National Health Programs;
Noncommunicable Diseases/prevention & control*;
Outcome Assessment, Health Care;
Population Surveillance;
Preventive Health Services/organization & administration*;
Program Evaluation;
Public Health;
United States
- From:
Chinese Journal of Epidemiology
2018;39(4):417-421
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective: To understand the current overall status of implementation on the National Demonstration Areas of Comprehensive Prevention and Control of Non-communicable Diseases. Methods: According to the scheme design of the questionnaires, all the National Demonstration Areas were involved in this study. For each National Demonstration Areas, eight departments were selected to complete a total of 12 questionnaires. Results: Scores related to the implementation of the National Demonstration Areas accounted for 71.8% of the total 170 points. Based on the scores gathered from this study, the 23-items-index-system that represented the status of project implementation was classified into seven categories. Categories with higher percentile scores would include: monitoring (88.0%), safeguard measures (75.0%), health education and health promotion (75.0%). Categories with lower percentile scores would include: the national health lifestyle actions (67.7%), community diagnosis (66.7%), discovery and intervention of high-risk groups (64.7%), and patient management (60.9%). There were significant differences noticed among the eastern, central and western areas on items as safeguard measures, health education/promotion, discovery and intervention of high-risk groups. In all, the implementation programs in the eastern Demonstration Areas seemed better than in the central or western regions. As for the 23 items, five of the highest scores appeared on policy support, mortality surveillance, tumor registration, reporting system on cardiovascular/cerebrovascular events, and on tobacco control, respectively. However, the lowest five scores fell on healthy diet, patient self-management program, oral hygiene, setting up the demonstration units and promotion on basic public health services, respectively. The overall scores in the eastern region was higher than that in the central or the western regions. The scores in the central and western regions showed basically the same. Conclusions: The overall status of implementation on the National Demonstration Areas was satisfactory. Future attention should be focusing on patient management as well as discovery and intervention of high-risk groups, which also presented the lowest scores, in this survey.
