Bibliometrics and visualization analysis of land use regression models in ambient air pollution research.
10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-6450.2018.02.018
- VernacularTitle:基于土地利用回归模型的大气污染研究文献计量学及可视化分析
- Author:
Y J ZHANG
1
;
D H ZHOU
2
;
Z P BAI
3
;
F X XUE
4
Author Information
1. The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300211, China.
2. Library of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300070, China.
3. State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China.
4. Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin 300052, China.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Air pollution;
Bibliometrics;
Cluster analysis;
Environmental epidemiology;
Land use regression models
- MeSH:
Air Pollutants/analysis*;
Air Pollution;
Bibliometrics;
China;
Environment;
Environmental Monitoring/methods*;
Humans;
Models, Theoretical;
Periodicals as Topic;
Regression Analysis;
Research
- From:
Chinese Journal of Epidemiology
2018;39(2):227-232
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective: To quantitatively analyze the current status and development trends regarding the land use regression (LUR) models on ambient air pollution studies. Methods: Relevant literature from the PubMed database before June 30, 2017 was analyzed, using the Bibliographic Items Co-occurrence Matrix Builder (BICOMB 2.0). Keywords co-occurrence networks, cluster mapping and timeline mapping were generated, using the CiteSpace 5.1.R5 software. Relevant literature identified in three Chinese databases was also reviewed. Results: Four hundred sixty four relevant papers were retrieved from the PubMed database. The number of papers published showed an annual increase, in line with the growing trend of the index. Most papers were published in the journal of Environmental Health Perspectives. Results from the Co-word cluster analysis identified five clusters: cluster#0 consisted of birth cohort studies related to the health effects of prenatal exposure to air pollution; cluster#1 referred to land use regression modeling and exposure assessment; cluster#2 was related to the epidemiology on traffic exposure; cluster#3 dealt with the exposure to ultrafine particles and related health effects; cluster#4 described the exposure to black carbon and related health effects. Data from Timeline mapping indicated that cluster#0 and#1 were the main research areas while cluster#3 and#4 were the up-coming hot areas of research. Ninety four relevant papers were retrieved from the Chinese databases with most of them related to studies on modeling. Conclusion: In order to better assess the health-related risks of ambient air pollution, and to best inform preventative public health intervention policies, application of LUR models to environmental epidemiology studies in China should be encouraged.
