Risk factors and prognoses analysis of new-onset atrial fibrillation in patients with acute myocardial infarction
10.3760/cma.j.issn.0578-1426.2019.02.010
- VernacularTitle:急性心肌梗死后新发心房颤动的危险因素及预后分析
- Author:
Yanyan JIN
1
;
Rong BAI
;
Ming YE
;
Hui AI
;
Yujie ZENG
;
Shaoping NIE
Author Information
1. 首都医科大学附属北京安贞医院急诊危重症中心 100029
- Keywords:
Myocardial infarction;
Atrial fibrillation;
C-reactive protein
- From:
Chinese Journal of Internal Medicine
2019;58(2):133-138
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To explore the risk factors and prognoses of new-onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI).Methods A total of 468 patients with AMI were admitted into Beijing Anzhen Hospital for emergency pereutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).According to the NOAF occurred during hospitalization,the patients were divided into two groups:the NOAF (n=37) group and the non-NOAF (n=431) group.Parameters including general clinical conditions,coronary lesions,echocardiography,biochemical markers,C-reactive protein (CRP),N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-pro-BNP),and myocardial markers were collected.In-hospital mortality and incidence of in-hospital main adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) were compared between the two groups.Logistic multivariate regression analyses were performed for the association between the risk factors and NOAF.Results The incidence of NOAF was 7.9％ in AMI patients undergoing emergency PCI.There were no significant differences in door-to-balloon time,weight,platelet counts,baseline serum creatinine (SCr),postoperative SCr,triglyceride,total cholesterol,low density lipoprotein cholesterol,high density lipoprotein cholesterol,uric acid,glycosylated hemoglobin A1c,preoperative medication,number of lesions,thrombus aspiration,location of myocardial infarction,and history of hypertension,diabetes,peripheral vascular disease and old myocardial infarction between the two groups.The percentage of women was in the NOAF group (32.4％ vs.16.7％,P＜0.05) and subjects in this group were significantly elder than those in the non-NOAF groups [(66±10) years vs.(571±11) years,P＜0.001].Moreover,the levels of no-reflow rate (40.5％ vs.12.6％,P＜0.001),CRP [25.2 (15.43,29.97)mg/L vs.5.21 (2.33,16.98) mg/L,P＜0.001],white blood cell counts [(11.19±3.44)× 109 vs.(9.91 ±3.23)× 109,p=0.022],NT-pro-BNP [(652.6± 108.8) ng/L vs.(258.3±105.9) ng/L,P＜0.001],and troponin I (TnI) [20.41(1.78,87.89) μg/L vs.7.72(1.29,36.39) μg/L,P=0.006] were significantly higher in the NOAF group than in the non-NOAF group,while left ventricular ejection fraction [(47.70± 7.34)％ vs.(53.35 ± 8.05)％,P＜0.001],and hemoglobin [137.0(125.5,146.0) g/L vs.144.0(133.0,156.0) g/L,P=0.042] were significantly lower in the NOAF group than the non-NOAF group.Patients in the NOAF group had significantly longer hospital stay than those in the non-NOAF group [(8.7± 5.6) d vs.(6.0± 2.3) d,P=0.007].The in-hospital mortality (8.1％ vs 1.4％ P=0.004) and the incidence of in-hospital MACCE (37.8％ vs.7.7％,P＜0.001) in the NOAF group were significantly higher than those in the non-NOAF group.Logistic multivariate regression analyses showed that age (HR 1.083,95％CI 1.028-1.141,P=0.003),CRP (HR 1.116,95％CI 1.049-1.187,P=0.001),NT-pro-BNP (HR 1.463,95％CI 1.001-4.064,P=0.001) and no-reflow (HR 4.388,95％CI 1.006-19.144,P=0.049) were independent predictors of NOAF after AMI.Conclusions Age,elevated levels of CRP,NT-pro-BNP,and the absence of no-reflow are risk factors for incident NOAF in patients with AMI in hospital.
