Impact factors of dose distribution in the abutment area duing total body irradiation with helical tomotherapy
10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-5098.2018.12.007
- VernacularTitle:螺旋断层放疗在分段全身照射中上下靶区衔接处剂量分布的影响因素研究
- Author:
Haiyang WANG
1
;
Shuaipeng LIU
;
Jia HUO
;
Bin HAN
;
Fangna WANG
;
Fei JIA
;
Lele LIU
;
Fanyang KONG
;
Yuntong PEI
;
Jinyan HU
;
Yuexin GUO
Author Information
1. 450052,郑州大学第一附属医院放射治疗部
- Keywords:
Helical tomotherapy;
Total body irradiation;
Field width;
Pitch;
Target gap distance
- From:
Chinese Journal of Radiological Medicine and Protection
2018;38(12):923-927
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the optimal distance between upper and lower target volumes and their correlated planning parameters by analyzing the dose distribution in the abutment regions during total body irradiation ( TBI) using helical tomotherapy. Methods A total of 10 patients with acute leukemia and with a height around 120 cm were enrolled. All patients were scanned by a Siemens simulation computerized tomography (CT) at a slice thickness of 5 mm. A lead wire was placed 10. 0 cm above the patella as a marker of the separation boundary for the upper and lower target volumes. The delineations of target volumes and organs at risk ( OARs ) were performed in the Varian Eclipse 13. 5 workstation with targets shrunk beyond the separation boundary at different distances. After contours and CT images were transferred to HT workstation, treatment plans were designed with different field width (FW, 5. 0 cm/2. 5 cm/1. 0 cm) and pitch values (0. 430/0. 287) at a modulation factor of 1. 8. All the plans were optimized with a dose calculation grid of 0. 195 cm × 0. 195 cm and identical planning parameters. The correlation between treatment planning parameters and targets shrunk distances were investigated by analyzing the dose distributions in the abutment area. Results The study demonstrated that the dose distributions in the abutment area were influenced only by the field width parameters: when the gap distance between the upper and lower targets was 5. 0 cm, the optimal FW is 5. 0 cm;Similarly when the gap distances were 2. 0 cm and 1. 0 cm, and the optimal FW 2. 5 cm and 1. 0 cm, respectively. In another words, the dose distribution of the abutment region was optimal when the target gap distance was equal to FW. Pitch values did not affect the quality of dose distribution in the abutment region and the overall treatment time ratio. Overall treatment time was inversely related to the FW. Conclusions Consistent target distance and FW is helpful to improve the dose homogeneity in the abutment area during TBI with HT. Appropriate planning parameters is critical to balance the treatment efficacy and efficiency.
