Crystalloid or colloid for goal-directed fluid therapy in cesarean section under combined spinal epidural anesthesia
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1008-1372.2018.12.018
- VernacularTitle:剖宫产术中行晶胶体目标导向治疗对产妇及新生儿的影响
- Author:
Nan SUN
1
;
Tian YU
;
Haojun XU
;
Ping ZHAO
Author Information
1. 中国医科大学附属盛京医院麻醉科
- Keywords:
Cesarean section;
Anesthesia/AE;
Hypotension/DT;
Fluid therapy;
Hemodynamics
- From:
Journal of Chinese Physician
2018;20(12):1829-1832,1836
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective This study will compare crystalloid to colloid for goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) in cesarean section under combined spinal epidural anesthesia,and to discuss which type of fluid is more effective to prevent perioperative hypotention.Methods We randomly assigned 60 patients (ASA Ⅰ-Ⅱ) scheduled undergoing cesarean section into two groups:colloid group and crystalloid group.The colloid group received balanced 6％ HES (130/0.4,Volulyte) and Lactated Ringer's solution (LR),while the crystalloid group just received LR as haemodynamic optimization fluid.The primary outcomes included the incidence of maternal hypotension,and vasopressor doses prior to delivery.The secondary outcomes included umbilical blood gas abnormalities,neonatal Apgar grade and adverse events.Results The impact fluid volume,total liquid volume and urine volume in the crystalloid group were more than those in the colloid group (P ＜ 0.05).No statistical difference was seen in the number of patients who showed hypotension,vomiting and nausea between two groups.And there was no significant difference in the incidence of neonatal adverse effects between two groups.Conclusions No evidence showed that colloid had more advantages in GDFT for patients received cesarean section under combined spinal epidural anesthesia,except that the volume of colloid input was less than crystalloid.
