Evaluation Framework for Telemedicine Using the Logical Framework Approach and a Fishbone Diagram.
10.4258/hir.2015.21.4.230
- Author:
Hyejung CHANG
1
Author Information
1. School of Management, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea. hjchang@khu.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Review
- Keywords:
Telemedicine;
Program Evaluation;
Quality of Healthcare;
Patient Safety
- MeSH:
Delivery of Health Care;
Logic*;
Patient Safety;
Program Evaluation;
Quality of Health Care;
Telemedicine*
- From:Healthcare Informatics Research
2015;21(4):230-238
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVES: Technological advances using telemedicine and telehealth are growing in healthcare fields, but the evaluation framework for them is inconsistent and limited. This paper suggests a comprehensive evaluation framework for telemedicine system implementation and will support related stakeholders' decision-making by promoting general understanding, and resolving arguments and controversies. METHODS: This study focused on developing a comprehensive evaluation framework by summarizing themes across the range of evaluation techniques and organized foundational evaluation frameworks generally applicable through studies and cases of diverse telemedicine. Evaluation factors related to aspects of information technology; the evaluation of satisfaction of service providers and consumers, cost, quality, and information security are organized using the fishbone diagram. RESULTS: It was not easy to develop a monitoring and evaluation framework for telemedicine since evaluation frameworks for telemedicine are very complex with many potential inputs, activities, outputs, outcomes, and stakeholders. A conceptual framework was developed that incorporates the key dimensions that need to be considered in the evaluation of telehealth implementation for a formal structured approach to the evaluation of a service. The suggested framework consists of six major dimensions and the subsequent branches for each dimension. CONCLUSIONS: To implement telemedicine and telehealth services, stakeholders should make decisions based on sufficient evidence in quality and safety measured by the comprehensive evaluation framework. Further work would be valuable in applying more comprehensive evaluations to verify and improve the comprehensive framework across a variety of contexts with more factors and participant group dimensions.
