Tools for Quality Evaluation of Clinical Research Reports.
- Author:
Cheolmin SHIN
1
;
Changsu HAN
;
Chi Un PAE
;
Ashwin A PATKAR
Author Information
1. Department of Psychiatry, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. hancs@korea.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Review
- Keywords:
Quality evaluation;
CONSORT;
STROBE;
TREND;
QUOROM;
MOOSE
- MeSH:
Checklist;
Meta-Analysis as Topic;
Research Report
- From:Korean Journal of Psychopharmacology
2011;22(2):67-72
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
Quality of medical research reports should be evaluated before they are applied to clinical practice. Since 1990s, several guidelines on research reports were suggested. Most recently published Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials statement 2010 consists of 25 checklists and flow diagram for reporting an randomized controlled trial. Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology statement is a checklist of items that should be addressed in articles reporting on the observational studies in epidemiology. TREND statement for the reporting of nonrandomized designs consists of 22 checklists. The Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses checklist proposes to provide checklist and flow diagram for reporting of meta-analyses. The Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology statement proposes a checklist for compensating the study errors about observational studies in epidemiology. After development of reporting guidelines, improvements in the quality of reports are continuously reported, so using guidelines in the medical research will be expected to be more generalized.
