Evaluation of Anti-dsDNA Antibody Tests: Crithidia luciliae Immunofluorescence Test, Immunoblot, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Chemiluminescence Immunoassay.
10.3343/kjlm.2010.30.6.675
- Author:
Jin young YANG
1
;
Eun Jee OH
;
Yonggoo KIM
;
Yeon Joon PARK
Author Information
1. Department of Laboratory Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. ejoh@catholic.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article ; Comparative Study ; English Abstract ; Evaluation Studies ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
- Keywords:
Anti-dsDNA;
Crithidia luciliae immunofluorescence test;
ELISA;
Chemiluminescence immunoassay;
Immunoblot assay
- MeSH:
Adult;
Antibodies, Antinuclear/*analysis;
Area Under Curve;
Chemiluminescent Measurements/*methods;
DNA/*immunology;
Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/*methods;
Female;
Fluorescent Antibody Technique/*methods;
Humans;
Immunoblotting/*methods;
Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/diagnosis;
Male;
Middle Aged;
ROC Curve;
Reagent Kits, Diagnostic;
Sensitivity and Specificity
- From:The Korean Journal of Laboratory Medicine
2010;30(6):675-684
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: Anti-double stranded DNA antibody (anti-dsDNA) test is useful for the diagnosis and monitoring of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Although several methods are available, none of them is completely satisfactory and differences among them have been reported. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of 6 commercial kits for anti-dsDNA detection. METHODS: A total of 142 sera (SLE [N=74], other systemic rheumatic diseases [N=50], other diseases [N=18]) were tested by 6 different assay kits using different antigenic sources of DNA: Crithidia luciliae immunofluorescence test (CLIFT), salmon testes (immunoblot, IB), human (ELISA I), salmon testes with nucleosome linker (ELISA II), plasmid (ELISA III), and synthetic oligonucleotides (chemiluminescence immunoassay, CLIA). RESULTS: With manufacturers' cut-off values, 6 test kits showed sensitivities of 55.4-91.9%. ELISA I had a greater sensitivity than the other five assays (P<0.001). The specificities of ELISA II, ELISA III, CLIA, and CLIFT were higher than those of ELISA I and IB (P<0.05). In ROC curve analysis, 3 ELISA kits and CLIA showed AUC values of 0.845-0.893, and revealed no significant differences among them (P>0.05). With cut-off values set at 95% of specificity, ELISA II had a higher sensitivity than ELISA III (63.5% vs. 41.9%, P<0.05). IB had poor concordance rates with other assays (42.0-65.0%). Pearson correlation coefficients among 4 quantitative assays were 0.667-0.798. CONCLUSIONS: Six different assays showed various performances depending on the methods and cut-off values used. Except IB, the other five assays can be used for the detection of anti-dsDNA.
