- Author:
Nicole A. Bernardo-Aliling
1
;
Adovich S. Rivera
2
;
Paul Matthew D. Pasco
3
Author Information
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH: Human; Male; Female; Aged 80 And Over; Aged; Middle Aged; Adult; Deglutition Disorders; Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation; Stroke; Pubmed; Qualitative Research; Pneumonia; Malnutrition
- From: Acta Medica Philippina 2017;51(4):327-333
- CountryPhilippines
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: Dysphagia is common among post-stroke patients,causing disability due to malnutrition and pneumonia. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a novel treatment modality to address this complication.
OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to compare real versus sham rTMS in treating post-stroke dysphagia.
METHODS: PubMed, Ovid, ClinicalKey, Herdin, and Google Scholar databases were searched from their earliest record to 31 July 2015 for randomized controlled trials that used rTMS to treat post-stroke dysphagia. The Jadad scale was used to assess the quality of the studies. The weighted mean difference (WMD) between baseline and post-treatment mean for Penetration Aspiration Scores (PAS) measured in the experimental and control groups were extracted for subsequent meta-analyses.
RESULTS: Three studies were analyzed. The WMD in PAS score between rTMS and control using liquid bolus two weeks after treatment in two good quality studies was -1.14 (95% confidence interval (CI) = -1.80 - -0.48, P = 0.001, I2 = 0.0%), and after four weeks was -1.83 (CI = -3.22 - -0.44, P = 0.010, I2 = 0.0%).
CONCLUSION: Treatment of post-stroke dysphagia with rTMS improved PAS on subgroup analyses of studies using liquid bolus after two weeks, and between real and sham treatment after four weeks.?
- Full text:505-Article Text-1942-1-10-20191121.pdf