Retrospective analysis of mediastinal mass resection with totally no tube during da Vinci robotic surgery for 79 patients
10.7507/1007-4848.201805076
- VernacularTitle:79 例完全无管化机器人纵隔肿物切除术的回顾性分析研究
- Author:
MENG Xiangrui
1
;
XU Wei
2
;
LIU Bo
2
;
WANG Xilong
2
;
DAI Feng
2
;
KANG Yunteng
2
;
LIN Jie
2
;
LIU Xingchi
2
;
XU Shiguang
2
;
WANG Shumin
2
Author Information
1. The Graduate Training Base of Jinzhou Medical University, General Hospital of Shenyang Military Command, Shenyang, 110016, P.R.China
2. Department of Thoracic Surgery, General Hospital of Shenyang Military Command, Shenyang, 110016, P.R.China
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
da Vinci robot;
video-assisted thoracoscope;
totally no tube;
mediastinal tumor
- From:
Chinese Journal of Clinical Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
2019;26(3):211-216
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To analyze the feasibility of totally no tube (TNT) in da Vinci robotic mediastinal mass surgery and its significance for fast track surgery. Methods A total of 79 patients receiving robotic mediastinal TNT surgery in the General Hospital of Shenyang Military Command from January 2016 to December 2017 were enrolled as a TNT group; 35 patients receiving robotic mediastinal surgery in General Hospital of Shenyang Military Command from January 2014 to December 2017 and 54 patients receiving thoracoscopic mediastinal surgery during the same period were enrolled as a non-TNT group and a video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) group. The muscle relaxation and tracheal intubation/laryngeal masking time, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative ICU stay, postoperative hospital stay, postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS), hospitalization costs and postoperative complications and other related indicators were retrospectively analyzed among the three groups. Results Surgeries were successfully completed in 168 patients with no transfer to thoracotomy, serious complications (postoperative complications in 9 patients) or death during the perioperative period. All patients were discharged. Compared with the non-TNT group, the TNT group had significantly less muscle relaxation-tracheal intubation/laryngeal masking time, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, VAS pain score, ICU stay, postoperative hospital stay (P<0.01); there was no significant difference in the total cost of hospitalization between the two groups (P>0.05). Between the non-TNT group and the VATS group, there was no significant difference in time of muscle relaxation and tracheal intubation, operation time and ICU stay (P>0.05). The non-TNT group was superior to the VATS group in terms of intraoperative blood loss, VAS pain scores on the following day after operation, chest drainage volume 1-3 days postoperatively, postoperative catheterization time and postoperative hospital stay (P<0.05); but the cost of hospitalization in the non-TNT group was significantly higher (P=0.000). Conclusion The da Vinci robot is safe and feasible for the treatment of mediastinal masses. At the same time, TNT is also safe and reliable on the basis of robotic surgery which has many advantages such as better comfort, less pain, ICU stay and hospital stay as well as faster recovery.
