Patient Radiation Dose in Neurointerventional Radiologic Procedure: A Tertiary Care Experience.
10.5469/neuroint.2018.00983
- Author:
Kittipong RIABROI
1
;
Khanin KHANUNGWANITKUL
;
Prasert WATTANAPONGPITAK
;
Anchali KRISANACHINDA
;
Keerati HONGSAKUL
Author Information
1. Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, Thailand. hkeerati@medicine.psu.ac.th
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Radiation dosage;
Endovascular procedures;
Radiation effects
- MeSH:
Cataract;
Endovascular Procedures;
Humans;
Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced;
Prospective Studies;
Radiation Dosage;
Radiation Effects;
Radiation, Ionizing;
Skin;
Tertiary Healthcare*
- From:Neurointervention
2018;13(2):110-116
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: Neurointerventional radiology procedures often require a long time to perform. Patient radiation dose is an important issue due to the hazards of ionizing radiation. The objective of this study was to measure the peak skin dose (PSD) and effective dose to estimate the deterministic and stochastic effects of a therapeutic interventional neuroradiologic procedure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The cumulative dose (CD) and dose area product (DAP) were automatically recorded by a fluoroscopic machine and collected prospectively between April and November 2015. The study included 54 patients who underwent therapeutic neurointerventional radiology procedures. The CD of each patient was used to estimate the peak skin dose and the DAP was also calculated to estimate the effective dose. RESULTS: The average estimated peak skin dose was 1,009.68 mGy. Two patients received radiation doses of more than 2 Gy, which is the threshold that may cause skin complications and radiation-induced cataract. The average effective dose was 35.32 mSv. The majority of patients in this study (85.2%) who underwent therapeutic neurointerventional radiologic procedures received effective doses greater than 20 mSv. CONCLUSION: Not all therapeutic neurointerventional radiology procedures are safe from deterministic complications. A small number of patients received doses above the threshold for skin complications and radiation induced cataract. In terms of stochastic complications, most neurointerventional radiology procedures in this study were quite safe in terms of radiation-induced cancer.
