Role of MAPK Signaling Pathways in Regulating the Hydrophobin Cryparin in the Chestnut Blight Fungus Cryphonectria parasitica.
10.5941/MYCO.2017.45.4.362
- Author:
Kum Kang SO
1
;
Dae Hyuk KIM
Author Information
1. Department of Molecular Biology, Department of Bioactive Material Sciences, Institute for Molecular Biology and Genetics, Chonbuk National University, Jeonju 54896, Korea. dhkim@jbnu.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Cryparin;
Cryphonectria parasitica;
Hydrophobin;
MADS-box transcription factor;
Mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathway
- MeSH:
Cell Wall;
Computer Simulation;
Down-Regulation;
Fungi*;
Genes, vif;
MAP Kinase Kinase Kinases;
Phenotype;
Promoter Regions, Genetic;
Protein Kinases;
Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction;
Transcription Factors;
Yeasts
- From:Mycobiology
2017;45(4):362-369
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
We assessed the regulation of cryparin, a class II hydrophobin, using three representative mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathways in Cryphonectria parasitica. Mutation of the CpSlt2 gene, an ortholog of yeast SLT2 in the cell wall integrity (CWI) pathway, resulted in a dramatic decrease in cryparin production. Similarly, a mutant of the CpBck1 gene, a MAP kinase kinase kinase gene in the CWI pathway, showed decreased cryparin production. Additionally, mutation of the cpmk1 gene, an ortholog of yeast HOG1, showed decreased cryparin production. However, mutation of the cpmk2 gene, an ortholog of yeast Kss1/Fus3, showed increased cryparin production. The easy-wet phenotype and accumulation of the cryparin transcript in corresponding mutants were consistent with the cryparin production results. In silico analysis of the promoter region of the cryparin gene revealed the presence of binding motifs related to downstream transcription factors of CWI, HOG1, and pheromone responsive pathways including MADS-box- and Ste12-binding domains. Real-time reverse transcriptase PCR analyses indicated that both CpRlm1, an ortholog of yeast RLM1 in the CWI pathway, and cpst12, an ortholog of yeast STE12 in the mating pathway, showed significantly reduced transcription levels in the mutant strains showing lower cryparin production in C. prasitica. However, the transcription of CpMcm1, an ortholog of yeast MCM1, did not correlate with that of the mutant strains showing downregulation of cryparin. These results indicate that three representative MAPK pathways played a role in regulating cryparin production. However, regulation varied depending on the MAPK pathways: the CWI and HOG1 pathways were stimulatory, whereas the pheromone-responsive MAPK was repressive.
