Regional Variation in Accessing Regional Hospitals for Cancer Patients.
- Author:
Yeon Ok MOON
1
;
Eun Cheol PARK
;
Hai Rim SHIN
;
Young Joo WON
;
Kyu Won JUNG
;
Jin Hee LEE
;
Soon Young HWANG
;
Hyun Joo KONG
;
Seung Sik HWANG
;
Jong Koo LEE
;
In Sik KONG
;
Myung Il HAHM
Author Information
1. National Cancer Control Research Institute, National Cancer Center, Korea. hmi@ncc.re.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Regional self-sufficiency;
Cancer patient;
Regional variation
- MeSH:
Gyeonggi-do;
Humans;
Incidence
- From:Korean Journal of Epidemiology
2006;28(2):152-161
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the differences in accessing regional hospitals and the utilization rate of hospitals located in other regions for cancer patients by regions. METHODS: Data for the utilization of regional hospitals for cancer patients were obtained from the Korean National Cancer Incidence Databases in 1999 and 2002. We divided the regions into 16 provinces by administrative districts. We using the SAS 9.1.3 to analyze difference of regional self-sufficiency and the Arcview 3.2 to show in a schematize for regional variation of the regional self-sufficiency. RESULTS: There were regional variations in the regional self-sufficiency of cancer patients. Especially, Jeollanam-do(1999 13.6%, 2002 12.8%), Gyeongsangbuk-do(1999 22.0%, 2002 20.7%), and Chungcheongnam-do(1999 27.8%, 2002 27.1%) had low regional self-sufficiency. The regional self-sufficiency in Gyeonggi-do and utilization rate of cancer patients who lived in other regions were increased between 1999 and 2002(regional self-sufficiency: 1999 37.2%, 2002 48.2%). CONCLUSION: The results of this study showed that there were regional variation in utilization of regional hospitals for cancer patients. Accessibility of cancer patients in metropolitan areas was higher than in small size cities, medium size cities, and rural county areas. These results suggested that it should be considered support medical facilities for cancer patients in rural areas where have lower relevance rate.
