Role of the vestibular and medullary reticular nuclei for the motor evoked potentials in rats.
- Author:
Min Sun KIM
1
;
Moon Young LEE
;
Sung Ho LEE
;
Jae Hyo KIM
;
Byung Rim PARK
Author Information
1. Department of Physiology, Wonkwang University, School of Medicine, Iksan 570-749, South Korea .
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Motor evoked potentials;
Sensorimotor cortex;
Vestibular nucleus;
Medullary reticular nucleus;
Lidocaine
- MeSH:
Adult;
Animals;
Central Nervous System;
Dissent and Disputes;
Efferent Pathways;
Electric Stimulation;
Electrodes;
Evoked Potentials, Motor*;
Hand;
Humans;
Lidocaine;
Microinjections;
Needles;
Rats*;
Rats, Sprague-Dawley;
Spinal Cord;
Stainless Steel;
Vestibular Nucleus, Lateral
- From:The Korean Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology
1997;1(6):603-611
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
The motor evoked potentials (MEPs) have been advocated as a method of monitoring the integrity of spinal efferent pathways in various injury models of the central nervous system. However, there were many disputes about origin sites of MEPs generated by transcranial electrical stimulation. The purpose of present study was to investigate the effect of major extrapyramidal motor nuclei such as lateral vestibular nucleus (VN) and medullary reticular nucleus (mRTN) on any components of the MEPs in adult Sprague-Dawley rats. MEPs were evoked by electrical stimulation of the right sensorimotor cortex through a stainless steel screw with 0.5mm in diameter, and recorded epidurally at T9 - T10 spinal cord levels by using a pair of teflon-coated stainless steel wire electrodes with 1mm exposed tip. In order to inject lidocaine and make a lesion, insulated long dental needle with noninsulated tips were placed stereotaxically in VN and mRTN. Lidocaine of 2~3 mul was injected into either VN or mRTN. The normal MEPs were composed of typical four reproducible waves; P1, P2, P3, P4. The first wave (P1) was shown at a mean latency of 1.2 ms, corresponding to a conduction velocity of 67.5 m/sec. The latencies of MEP were shortened and the amplitudes were increased as stimulus intensity was increased. The amplitudes of P1 and P2 were more decreased among 4 waves of MEPs after lidocaine microinjection into mRTN. Especially, the amplitude of P1 was decreased by 50% after lidocaine microinjection into bilateral mRTN. On the other hand, lidocaine microinjection into VN reduced the amplitudes of P3 and P4 than other MEP waves. However, the latencies of MEPs were not changed by lidocaine microinjection into either VN or mRTN. These results suggest that the vestibular and reticular nuclei contribute to partially different role in generation of MEPs elicited by transcranial electrical stimulation.
