- Author:
Yoonae A CHO
1
;
Soo KIM
;
Michael H GRAEF
Author Information
- Publication Type:Original Article ; Case Reports ; Comparative Study
- Keywords: Brown syndrome; Insertion of silicone expander; SO recession; SO tenotomy
- MeSH: Treatment Outcome; Time Factors; Syndrome; Silicone Elastomers; Prosthesis Implantation/instrumentation; Ophthalmologic Surgical Procedures/*methods; Oculomotor Muscles/physiopathology/*surgery; Ocular Motility Disorders/physiopathology/*surgery; Male; Humans; Follow-Up Studies; Female; Eye Movements/physiology; Child, Preschool; Child; Adult
- From:Korean Journal of Ophthalmology 2006;20(1):33-40
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
- Abstract: PURPOSE: To evaluate the outcomes of surgery for Brown syndrome. METHODS: We reviewed the charts of 15 patients who underwent surgery for Brown syndrome. The limitation of elevation in adduction (LEA) ranged from -2 to -4 degrees. A superior oblique muscle (SO) tenotomy was performed in 4 patients, a silicone expander was inserted in the SO of 9 patients, and a SO recession was performed in 2 patients. The results of surgery were analyzed with a follow-up period of more than 6 months, 42.3+/-48.42 months on average. RESULTS: Nine female patients and 6 male patients with unilateral Brown syndrome were selected for this study. The left eye was the affected eye in 9 patients. The degree of preoperative LEA was -2 to -4 in 4 patients in whom SO tenotomy was performed, -3 to -4 in 9 patients treated with the silicone expander, and -2 to -4 in 2 patients treated with SO recession. The LEA was released after surgery in all patients without postoperative adhesion. However, unilateral overaction of the inferior oblique muscle due to excessive weakening of the SO occurred in 1 patient with tenotomy (25%) and in 1 patient with insertion of a silicone expander (11%). CONCLUSIONS: LEA was released after tenotomy, insertion of a silicone expander and recession of the SO in 13 of 15 patients with Brown syndrome. SO palsy due to overcorrection and under-correction with postoperative adhesion should be avoided.