A Follow-up of Neurogenic Bladder in Patients with Spinal Cord Injury.
- Author:
Min Sik IM
1
;
Bum Suk LEE
;
Min Wook KIM
;
Chang Won KIM
;
Kee Kyung KIM
;
Jae Hyung KIM
;
Byung Soon SHIN
Author Information
1. National Rehabiltation Hospital.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Neurogenic bladder;
Urologic evaluation;
Vesicoureteral reflux;
Risk factors
- MeSH:
Administration, Intravesical;
Atropine;
Congenital Abnormalities;
Follow-Up Studies*;
Humans;
Incidence;
Rehabilitation;
Risk Factors;
Spinal Cord Injuries*;
Spinal Cord*;
Urinary Bladder;
Urinary Bladder, Neurogenic*;
Urinary Tract;
Urodynamics;
Vesico-Ureteral Reflux
- From:Journal of the Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine
1999;23(5):954-960
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE: The purposes of this study were 1) to evaluate the effectiveness of follow-up urologic evaluation of neurogenic bladder in patients with spinal cord injury, 2) to define risk factors causing upper urinary tract complications, and 3) to evaluate changes of the vesicoureteral reflux grade on follow-up study. METHOD: Urodynamic studys, ultrasonographys, and voiding cystourethrographys of 90 patients with spinal cord injury who admitted to the bladder clinic of National Rehabilitation Hostpital were evaluated. Of the 90 patients, twenty four patients (27%) had upper urinary tract complication (vesicoureteral reflux or hydronephrosis). The risk factors of upper urinary tract complication were compared. The patients who had vesicoureteral reflux were devided into two main groups: conservative medical treatment group (oxybutynin, atropine intravesical instillation and intermittent catheterization) and primary surgical treatment group, and then the changes of the vesicoureteral reflux grade on follow-up study were evlauated. RESULTS: 1) The incidence of upper urinary tract complication was 27% for all patients. After bladder clinic evaluation, the patients who were recommended the change of the voiding mothods were 24%, and 58% of the patients were need management to decrease maximal detrusor pressure. 2) Maximal bladder capacity by clinical voiding chart recording (< or =250 ml), bladder wall deformity (> or =trabeculation grade 2), leak point pressure (> or =40 cmH20), and maximal detrusor pressure (> or =90 cmH2O) were significantly different between patients with upper urinary tract complication and patients without that. 3) In the eight vesicoureteral reflux patients, five of six patients were cured or improved with conservative treatment and two patients were cured with surgical treatment. CONCLUSION: The periodic follow-up evaluation of neurogenic bladder of spinal cord injuredpatients was important to prevent upper urinary tract deterioration. The factors related upper urinary tract complication were clinical bladder capacity, leak point pressure, bladder wall deformity (trabeculation) and maximal detrusor pressure.
