DNA Fingerprinting of Candida albicans Strains Isolated from Candidemic Patients by Polymerase Chain Reaction and Southern Hybridization Methods.
- Author:
Ju Yeoul PARK
1
;
Jong Hee SHIN
;
Sung Jin YANG
;
Bong Joon OH
;
Duck CHO
;
Seong Jung KEE
;
Myung Gun SHIN
;
Soon Pal SUH
;
Dong Wook RYANG
Author Information
1. Department of Family Medicine, Seoul Veterans Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Candida albicans;
Candidemia;
IR PCR;
C1 fingerprinting;
Southern hybridization
- MeSH:
Blotting, Southern;
Candida albicans*;
Candida*;
Candidemia;
Catheters;
Dermatoglyphics;
DNA Fingerprinting*;
DNA*;
Genotype;
Humans;
Molecular Typing;
Polymerase Chain Reaction*;
Respiratory System
- From:
Infection and Chemotherapy
2004;36(6):357-365
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: Although several molecular typing methods have been used to investigate C. albicans infections, there remains no "gold standard" method by which relatedness of C. albicans strains is determined. In this study, two DNA fingerprinting methods were compared for genotyping of clinical strains of C. albicans isolated from candidemic patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-nine strains of C. albicans isolated from various clinical specimens (14 from blood, 7 from catheter, 4 from respiratory tract secretion, and 4 from urine) of 14 candidemic patients were analyzed. Primer 1245 and 1246 were employed for IR PCR and Southern blot hybridization method was used for C2 fingerprinting, with Ca3 and C1 as primers, after the fragmentation of DNA with EcoR1 RESULTS: IR PCR method separated 29 isolates into 9 (1245 primer), 7 (1246 primer) and 14 (combination of two primers) types, whereas C1 fingerprinting identified 16 different types. By combining the IR PCR and C1 fingerprinting methods, total of 16 different genotypes were identified among 29 isolates from 14 patients, which is the same result obtained by the C1 fingerprinting only. Using both methods, blood and non-blood isolates from each patient produced identical genotypes for 10 patients and different genotypes for 1 patient. In three patients, isolates from blood and other site of each patient showed identical patterns by IR PCR fingerprinting, but appeared different (n=1) or similar (n=2) by C1 fingerprinting. Overall, for 87% (13/15) of patients, isolates collected from catheter (6 of 7 patients), urine (4 of 4 patients), or respiratory (3 of 4 patients) were identical or similar to the corresponding blood isolates. CONCLUSION: Our study shows that C1 fingerprinting method is more discriminatory than IR PCR for the molecular typing of C. albicans isolates. For the majority of patients, blood and other site isolates had identical or similar genotypes.
