Experience of 16 years and its associated challenges in the Field Epidemiology Training Program in Korea.
- Author:
Moo Sik LEE
1
;
Eun Young KIM
;
Sang Won LEE
Author Information
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords: Epidemiological investigations; Infectious diseases; Middle East Respiratory Syndrome,; Korea
- MeSH: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U.S.); Communicable Diseases; Communicable Diseases, Emerging; Coronavirus Infections; Education*; Epidemiology*; Korea*; Public Health
- From:Epidemiology and Health 2017;39(1):e2017058-
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
- Abstract: OBJECTIVES: The field epidemiologist system of South Korea, which employs public health doctors who are relatively more readily available, was created in 1999 to ensure a ready supply of experts for epidemiological investigations and enable an effective response for new and reemerging infectious diseases. However, the 2015 outbreak of Middle East Respiratory Syndrome revealed limitations in the existing systems of management of field epidemiologists and communicable diseases. METHODS: The present study aims to evaluate data on current states, administrative reports, and other literature on the field epidemiologist system that has been in place in South Korea for 16 years since 1999 and to suggest appropriate future improvements in this system. RESULTS: By suggesting methods to evaluate the field epidemiologist system and training programs and by suggesting ways for the Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to conduct evaluations on its own, the present study provides supporting evidence for improvement of systems for training of experts in epidemiological investigations. Moreover, based on the findings, this study also suggests methods to systematically train experts in communicable diseases management and a sustainable system to establish the basis of and develop strategies for a systematic and phased management of field epidemiologist training programs. CONCLUSIONS: The present study suggests the possibility of establishing dedicated training facilities, revising the guidelines on training and improvement of the competency of public health experts, while not limiting the scope of application to communicable diseases.
