The Effect of Immunosuppressive Therapy on Aplastic Anemia: Long-Term Treatment Outcome.
- Author:
Seong Cheol KIM
1
;
Seok LEE
;
So Young CHONG
;
Nae Choon YOO
;
Yoo Hong MIN
;
Jee Sook HAHN
;
Yun Woong KO
Author Information
1. Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Aplastic anemia;
Immunosuppressive therapy
- MeSH:
Anemia, Aplastic*;
Antilymphocyte Serum;
Cyclosporine;
Diagnosis;
Follow-Up Studies;
Hematologic Diseases;
Humans;
Korea;
Neutrophils;
Recurrence;
Stem Cells;
Survival Rate;
Treatment Outcome*
- From:Korean Journal of Hematology
1997;32(1):67-78
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: There has been much evidence that immune-mediated stem cell injury may have a significant role in the pathogenesis of aplastic anemia, and as a result immunosuppressive therapy has become known as an effective treatment for patients with aplastic anemia. There have been no reports regarding the long-term follow-up of immunosuppressive therapy of patients with aplastic anemia in Korea. Therefore, we evaluated the response to immunosuppressive therapy for 47 patients with aplastic anemia, investigating the long-term survival, relapse rate and secondary clonal hematologic diseases. METHODS: Antithymocyte globulin (ATG) or antilymphocyte globulin (ALG) was given with cyclosporin A (CsA) to 39 patients (ATG+CsA 27, ALG+CsA 12), and to 8 patients, ATG or ALG alone was given (ATG 6, ALG 2). ATG was administered for 5 (or 8) days, and ALG was administered for 5 days. CsA was orally begun with ATG or ALG for a median total of 4.5 (3~14) months. RESULTS: 1) Response: Among 47 patients, 30 (63.8%) responded; 11 showed complete response (CR) and 19 showed partial response (PR). 2) Factors affecting response: Responses were equally distributed when patients were stratified for age, neutrophil counts and drug regimens. 3) Survival: Median duration of follow-up was 36 (6~84) months. Actuarial survival at 1 year was 100% in responders and 76% in nonresponders, and the 7-year actuarial survival rate was 94% and 76%, respectively (P value = 0.13). 4) Relapse: Relapse occurred in 4 of 30 responding patients. Relapse in patients with CR was not observed during follow-up. The risk of relapse was 12% at 2 years and 22% at 6 years. 5) Treatment outcome according to disease duration: There was no significant difference in response rate between patients treated within 4 months and beyond 4 months after diagnosis. But the latter group showed a significantly higher relapse rate than the former (4% vs 60%; P value = 0.01). 6) Side effects and complications: There were no serious side effects requiring discontinuation of immunosuppressive therapy. Evolution to secondary clonal hematologic diseases was not observed during follow-up. CONCLUSION: Our results of immunosuppressive therapy show the excellent long-term outcome. A prospective study is needed for the establishment of the adequate treatment duration of CsA and the follow-up period for the evaluation of the response of treatment.
