Mid-Term Results of Fixed Bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up.
10.4055/jkoa.2018.53.6.498
- Author:
Jeong Han OH
1
;
Il Han JOO
;
Dong Yi KONG
;
Choong Hyeok CHOI
Author Information
1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. chhchoi@hanyang.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
knee;
fixed bearing;
unicompartmental knee arthroplasty
- MeSH:
Arthritis;
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee*;
Diagnosis;
Dislocations;
Female;
Follow-Up Studies*;
Humans;
Joints;
Knee;
Knee Joint;
Male;
Osteoarthritis;
Osteolysis;
Osteonecrosis;
Prostheses and Implants;
Range of Motion, Articular
- From:The Journal of the Korean Orthopaedic Association
2018;53(6):498-504
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes, and the complications of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) using a fixed bearing prosthesis after 5-year follow-up. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-six knees (25 patients) that underwent fixed bearing UKA between May 2003 and August 2011 were included. The subjects were 3 males (3 knees) and 22 females (23 knees), and the average age was 63.5 years. The preoperative diagnosis was osteoarthritis (23 knees) and osteonecrosis (3 knees). The mean follow-up duration was 67 months (from 60 to 149 months). The clinical evaluation included pre- and postoperative American knee society knee and function score, and range of motion. The radiology evaluation included standing antero-posterior, lateral view, and fluoroscopic film to analyze the postoperative alignment and osteolysis. RESULTS: The mean American Knee Society knee score and function score were improved from 42.0 and 57.5 to 87.9 and 85.0, respectively (p < 0.001). The mean preoperative and postoperative range of motion was 132.9° and 132.5°, respectively. The mean femorotibial angle were varus 0.5° preoperatively and valgus 2.2° postoperatively. A radiolucent line was observed in 2 knees; one knee had a stable implant, while in the other knee, patellofemoral arthritis was identified during UKA. Diffuse pain of the knee joint with tenderness of the medial joint line was identified at the follow-up, so conversion to total knee arthroplasty was recommended. No other complications, such as osteolysis, infections, postoperative stiffness, and dislocation, were encountered. CONCLUSION: The midterm results of fixed bearing UKA were clinically and radiologically satisfactory.
