Use of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Axillary Node-Positive Breast Cancer in Diagnosis.
- Author:
Hee Jun CHOI
1
;
Isaac KIM
;
Emad ALSHARIF
;
Sungmin PARK
;
Jae Myung KIM
;
Jai Min RYU
;
Seok Jin NAM
;
Seok Won KIM
;
Jonghan YU
;
Se Kyung LEE
;
Jeong Eon LEE
Author Information
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords: Breast neoplasms; Lymph node excision; Neoadjuvant therapy; Sentinel lymph node biopsy
- MeSH: Arm; Breast Neoplasms*; Breast*; Diagnosis*; Disease-Free Survival; Drug Therapy*; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Lymph Node Excision; Lymph Nodes; Lymphedema; Neoadjuvant Therapy; Neoplasm Metastasis; Pathology; Polymerase Chain Reaction; Recurrence; Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy*
- From:Journal of Breast Cancer 2018;21(4):433-441
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
- Abstract: PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) on recurrence and survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in breast cancer patients with cytology-proven axillary node metastasis. METHODS: We selected patients who were diagnosed with invasive breast cancer and axillary lymph node metastasis and were treated with NAC followed by curative surgery between January 2007 and December 2014. We classified patients into three groups: group A, negative sentinel lymph node (SLN) status and no further dissection; group B, negative SLN status with backup axillary lymph node dissection (ALND); and group C, no residual axillary metastasis on pathology with standard ALND. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 51 months (range, 3–122 months) and the median number of retrieved SLNs was 5 (range, 2–9). The SLN identification rate was 98.3% (234/238 patients), and the false negative rate of SLNB after NAC was 7.5%. There was no significant difference in axillary recurrence-free survival (p=0.118), disease-free survival (DFS; p=0.578) or overall survival (OS; p=0.149) among groups A, B, and C. In the subgroup analysis of breast pathologic complete response (pCR) status, there was no significant difference in DFS (p=0.271, p=0.892) or OS (p=0.207, p=0.300) in the breast pCR and non-pCR patients. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that SLNB can be feasible and oncologically safe after NAC for cytology-determined axillary node metastasis patients and could help reduce arm morbidity and lymphedema by avoiding ALND in SLN-negative patients.
