Clinical Outcomes of Reduced-Port Laparoscopic Surgery for Patients With Sigmoid Colon Cancer: Surgery With 1 Surgeon and 1 Camera Operator.
- Author:
Jung Ryul OH
1
;
Sung Chan PARK
;
Sung Sil PARK
;
Beonghoon SOHN
;
Hyoung Min OH
;
Bun KIM
;
Min Jung KIM
;
Chang Won HONG
;
Kyung Su HAN
;
Dae Kyung SOHN
;
Jae Hwan OH
Author Information
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords: Reduced-port laparoscopic surgery; Sigmoid colon cancer; Colectomy; One surgeon plus one camera operator surgery; Three-port surgery
- MeSH: Colectomy; Colon, Sigmoid*; Humans; Laparoscopy*; Sigmoid Neoplasms*
- From:Annals of Coloproctology 2018;34(6):292-298
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
- Abstract: PURPOSE: This study compared the perioperative clinical outcomes of reduced-port laparoscopic surgery (RPLS) with those of conventional multiport laparoscopic surgery (MPLS) for patients with sigmoid colon cancer and investigated the safety and feasibility of RPLS performed by 1 surgeon and 1 camera operator. METHODS: From the beginning of 2010 until the end of 2014, 605 patients underwent a colectomy for sigmoid colon cancer. We compared the characteristics, postoperative outcomes, and pathologic results for the patients who underwent RPLS and for the patients who underwent MPLS. We also compared the clinical outcomes of single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) and 3-port laparoscopic surgery. RESULTS: Of the 115 patients in the RPLS group, 59 underwent SILS and 56 underwent 3-port laparoscopic surgery. The MPLS group included 490 patients. The RPLS group had shorter operating time (137.4 ± 43.2 minutes vs. 155.5 ± 47.9 minutes, P < 0.001) and shorter incision length (5.3 ± 2.2 cm vs. 7.8 ± 1.2 cm, P < 0.001) than the MPLS group. In analyses of SILS and 3-port laparoscopic surgery, the SILS group showed younger age, longer operating time, and shorter incision length than the 3-port surgery group and exhibited a more advanced T stage, more lymphatic invasion, and larger tumor size. CONCLUSION: RPLS performed by 1 surgeon and 1 camera operator appears to be a feasible and safe surgical option for the treatment of patients with sigmoid colon cancer, showing comparable clinical outcomes with shorter operation time and shorter incision length than MPLS. SILS can be applied to patients with favorable tumor characteristics.
