Hemodynamic effects of different types of pneumatic compression of the lower extremities during anesthesia induction: a prospective randomized controlled trial.
- Author:
Hyungsun LIM
1
;
Jin Wan KIM
;
Kijae LEE
;
Donghak SEO
;
Seonghoon KO
Author Information
- Publication Type:Randomized Controlled Trial ; Original Article
- Keywords: Aged; Anesthesia; Hemodynamics; Lower extremity; Pneumatic compression
- MeSH: Anesthesia*; Arterial Pressure; Blood Pressure; Hemodynamics*; Humans; Intubation; Lower Extremity*; Prospective Studies*; Stroke Volume
- From:Korean Journal of Anesthesiology 2018;71(5):386-393
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
- Abstract: BACKGROUND: The current study evaluated the hemodynamic effects of different types of pneumatic compressions of the lower extremities during anesthesia induction. In addition, the hemodynamic effects were compared between patients older than 65 age years and those aged 65 years or younger. METHODS: One hundred and eighty patients (90: > 65 years and 90: ≤ 65 years) were enrolled. Each age group of patients was randomly assigned to one of three groups; Group 1 (no compression), Group 2 (sequential pneumatic compression), and Group 3 (sustained pneumatic compression without decompression). Invasive blood pressure, cardiac index (CI), and stroke volume variation (SVV) were measured. RESULTS: In patients aged ≤ 65 years, mean arterial pressure (MAP) and CI were significantly higher and SVV was lower in Group 3 compared to Group 1 before tracheal intubation, but there were no differences between Groups 1 and 2. However, there were no differences in MAP, CI, and SVV among the three groups in patients aged > 65 years. The number of patients who showed a MAP < 60 mmHg was less in Group 3 than Group 1 in patients aged ≤ 65 years, but not in patients aged > 65 years. CONCLUSIONS: Sustained pneumatic compression of the lower extremities has more hemodynamic stabilizing effects compared to sequential compression during anesthesia induction in patients aged 65 years or younger. However, no difference between methods of compression was observed in patients older than 65 years.
