Click Chemistry-Based Injectable Hydrogels and Bioprinting Inks for Tissue Engineering Applications.
10.1007/s13770-018-0152-8
- Author:
Janarthanan GOPINATHAN
1
;
Insup NOH
Author Information
1. Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Seoul National University of Science and Technology (Seoul Tech), 232 Gongneung-ro, Nowon-Gu, Seoul 01811, Republic of Korea. insup@seoultech.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Review
- Keywords:
Click chemistry;
Hydrogels;
3D bioprinting;
Tissue engineering;
Regenerative medicine
- MeSH:
Biocompatible Materials;
Bioprinting*;
Click Chemistry;
Cycloaddition Reaction;
Hydrogel*;
Hydrogels*;
Ink*;
Regeneration;
Regenerative Medicine;
Tissue Engineering*
- From:
Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
2018;15(5):531-546
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: The tissue engineering and regenerative medicine approach require biomaterials which are biocompatible, easily reproducible in less time, biodegradable and should be able to generate complex three-dimensional (3D) structures to mimic the native tissue structures. Click chemistry offers the much-needed multifunctional hydrogel materials which are interesting biomaterials for the tissue engineering and bioprinting inks applications owing to their excellent ability to form hydrogels with printability instantly and to retain the live cells in their 3D network without losing the mechanical integrity even under swollen state. METHODS: In this review, we present the recent developments of in situ hydrogel in the field of click chemistry reported for the tissue engineering and 3D bioinks applications, by mainly covering the diverse types of click chemistry methods such as Diels–Alder reaction, strain-promoted azide-alkyne cycloaddition reactions, thiol-ene reactions, oxime reactions and other interrelated reactions, excluding enzyme-based reactions. RESULTS: The click chemistry-based hydrogels are formed spontaneously on mixing of reactive compounds and can encapsulate live cells with high viability for a long time. The recent works reported by combining the advantages of click chemistry and 3D bioprinting technology have shown to produce 3D tissue constructs with high resolution using biocompatible hydrogels as bioinks and in situ injectable forms. CONCLUSION: Interestingly, the emergence of click chemistry reactions in bioink synthesis for 3D bioprinting have shown the massive potential of these reaction methods in creating 3D tissue constructs. However, the limitations and challenges involved in the click chemistry reactions should be analyzed and bettered to be applied to tissue engineering and 3D bioinks. The future scope of these materials is promising, including their applications in in situ 3D bioprinting for tissue or organ regeneration.
