Ligand-Independent Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Overexpression Correlates with Poor Prognosis in Colorectal Cancer.
- Author:
Sumi YUN
1
;
Yoonjin KWAK
;
Soo Kyung NAM
;
An Na SEO
;
Heung Kwon OH
;
Duck Woo KIM
;
Sung Bum KANG
;
Hye Seung LEE
Author Information
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords: Colorectal neoplasms; Epidermal growth factor receptor; Ligands; mRNA in situ hybridization
- MeSH: Betacellulin; Colorectal Neoplasms*; Disease-Free Survival; Epidermal Growth Factor*; Heparin; Humans; Immunohistochemistry; In Situ Hybridization; Incidence; Ligands; Multivariate Analysis; Prognosis*; Receptor, Epidermal Growth Factor*; RNA, Messenger; Silver; Transforming Growth Factors
- From:Cancer Research and Treatment 2018;50(4):1351-1361
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
- Abstract: PURPOSE: Molecular treatments targeting epidermal growth factor receptors (EGFRs) are important strategies for advanced colorectal cancer (CRC). However, clinicopathologic implications of EGFRs and EGFR ligand signaling have not been fully evaluated. We evaluated the expression of EGFR ligands and correlation with their receptors, clinicopathologic factors, and patients’ survival with CRC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The expression of EGFR ligands, including heparin binding epidermal growth factor-like growth factor (HBEGF), transforming growth factor (TGF), betacellulin, and epidermal growth factor (EGF), were evaluated in 331 consecutive CRC samples using mRNA in situ hybridization (ISH). We also evaluated the expression status of EGFR, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), HER3, and HER4 using immunohistochemistry and/or silver ISH. RESULTS: Unlike low incidences of TGF (38.1%), betacellulin (7.9%), and EGF (2.1%), HBEGF expression was noted in 62.2% of CRC samples. However, the expression of each EGFR ligand did not reveal significant correlations with survival. The combined analyses of EGFR ligands and EGFR expression indicated that the ligands–/EGFR+ group showed a significant association with the worst disease-free survival (DFS; p=0.018) and overall survival (OS; p=0.005). It was also an independent, unfavorable prognostic factor for DFS (p=0.026) and OS (p=0.007). Additionally, HER4 nuclear expression, regardless of ligand expression, was an independent, favorable prognostic factor for DFS (p=0.034) and OS (p=0.049), by multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: Ligand-independent EGFR overexpression was suggested to have a significant prognostic impact; thus, the expression status of EGFR ligands, in addition to EGFR, might be necessary for predicting patients' outcome in CRC.
