Comparison of Effects of Oral Health Program and Walking Exercise Program on Health Outcomes for Pregnant Women.
10.4040/jkan.2018.48.5.506
- Author:
Hae jin PARK
1
;
Haejung LEE
Author Information
1. Department of Nursing, Kyungnam College of Information & Technology, Busan, Korea.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Pregnant Women;
Periodontal Diseases;
Oral Health;
Walking
- MeSH:
Female;
Health Behavior;
Humans;
Motor Activity;
Oral Health*;
Parturition;
Periodontal Diseases;
Pregnant Women*;
Social Sciences;
Walking*
- From:Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing
2018;48(5):506-520
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: To compare the effects of the Interaction Model of Client Health Behavior (IMCHB)-based oral health program (OHP) and walking exercise program (WEP) on oral health behaviors, periodontal disease, physical activity, and psychological indicators (depression, stress, and quality of life) in pregnant women. METHODS: A nonequivalent control group pretest-posttest design was adopted to compare the effects of a 12-week OHP and WEP on pregnant women (n=65). Pregnant women were randomly assigned to the oral health group (OHG; n=23), walking exercise group (WEG; n=21), or control group (CG; n=21). Data were analyzed by the χ2-test, Fisher's exact test, Scheffe test, and repeated measures ANOVA, using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences for Windows (version 21.0). RESULTS: The OHG and WEG showed significant improvements in oral health behaviors, periodontal disease, and psychological indicators as compared to the CG. The WEG showed significant improvement in physical activity as compared to the OHG and CG. CONCLUSION: These findings indicate that the IMCHB-based OHP and WEP were effective in improving periodontal disease, physical activity, and psychological indicators. However, further studies are needed to identify the positive effects of the OHP and WEP on birth outcomes.
