Consensus Guides on Stroke Thrombolysis for Anticoagulated Patients from Japan: Application to Other Populations.
- Author:
Kazunori TOYODA
1
;
Hiroshi YAMAGAMI
;
Masatoshi KOGA
Author Information
- Publication Type:Multicenter Study ; Review
- Keywords: Guide; Stroke; Anticoagulants; Atrial fibrillation; Idarucizumab; Thrombolyic therapy
- MeSH: Anticoagulants; Antidotes; Asian Continental Ancestry Group; Atrial Fibrillation; Consensus*; Dabigatran; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Japan*; Partial Thromboplastin Time; Prothrombin Time; Stroke*; Thrombectomy
- From:Journal of Stroke 2018;20(3):321-331
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
- Abstract: Development of direct oral anticoagulants and their antidotes has led to the need to reconsider the eligibility of acute stroke patients who have been taking oral anticoagulants for intravenous thrombolysis. Officially authorized Japanese guidelines on this issue were revised twice at the time of approval for clinical use of direct oral anticoagulants and idarucizumab, a specific reversal agent for dabigatran. A unique recommendation in the latest Japanese clinical guides was that thrombolysis can be recommended if the time of the last dose of direct oral anticoagulants exceeds 4 hours and if commonly available anticoagulation markers are normal or subnormal, i.e., international normalized ratio of prothrombin time < 1.7 and activated partial thromboplastin time < 1.5 times the baseline value (≤40 seconds only as a guide). These criteria are partly supported by the findings of domestic multicenter and single-center surveys that symptomatic or asymptomatic intracranial hemorrhage following thrombolysis was rare under the conditions of the criteria. Even for dabigatran users, stroke thrombolysis can be considered without pretreatment by idarucizumab if patients meet the above criteria. If not, direct mechanical thrombectomy can be considered without pretreatment by idarucizumab or thrombolysis, and use of idarucizumab, followed immediately by thrombolysis, can be considered only when thrombectomy cannot be quickly performed. These clinical guides are practical and to some extent economical, but they have some limitations, including lack of corroborating information from sufficient numbers of relevant cases. The guides will be further modified based on the results of future research.
