- Author:
Mi Yeong KIM
1
;
Chan Sun PARK
;
Jae won JEONG
Author Information
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords: Patient care management; Education; Professional; Anaphylaxis; Emergency medical services
- MeSH: Adult*; Anaphylaxis*; Education; Educational Status*; Emergencies*; Emergency Medical Services; Emergency Service, Hospital*; Epinephrine; Humans; Hypersensitivity; Hypotension; Medical Staff; Outpatients; Patient Care Management
- From:The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine 2018;33(5):1008-1015
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
- Abstract: BACKGROUND/AIMS: We evaluated the management and educational status of adult anaphylaxis patients at emergency departments (EDs). METHODS: Anaphylaxis patients who visited ED from 2011 to 2013 were enrolled from three hospitals. We analyzed clinical features, prior history of anaphylaxis, management and provided education for etiology and/or prevention. For analyzing associated factors with epinephrine injection, Pearson chi-square test was used by SPSS version 21 (IBM Co.). RESULTS: A total of 194 anaphylaxis patients were enrolled. Ninety-nine patients (51%) visited ED by themselves. Time interval from symptom onset to ED visit was 62 ± 70.5 minutes. Drug (56.2%) was the most frequent cause of anaphylaxis. Forty-seven patients (24.2%) had prior history of anaphylaxis and 33 patients had same suspicious cause with current anaphylaxis. Cutaneous (88.7%) and respiratory (72.7%) symptoms were frequent. Hypotension was presented in 114 patients (58.8%). Mean observation time in ED was 12 ± 25.7 hours and epinephrine was injected in 114 patients (62%). In 68 patients, epinephrine was injected intramuscularly with mean dose of 0.3 ± 0.10 mg. Associated factor with epinephrine injection was hypotension (p = 0.000). Twenty-three patients (13%) were educated about avoidance of suspicious agent. Epinephrine auto-injectors were prescribed only in five patients. Only 34 (19%) and 72 (40%) patients were consulted to allergist at ED and outpatient allergy department respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We suggested that management and education of anaphylaxis were not fully carried out in ED. An education and promotion program on anaphylaxis is needed for medical staff.