Radio Frequency Ablation in the Rabbit Lung Using Wet Electrodes: Comparison of Monopolar and Dual Bipolar Electrode Mode.
- Author:
Gong Yong JIN
1
;
Sang Hee PARK
;
Young Min HAN
;
Gyung Ho CHUNG
;
Hyo Sung KWAK
;
Soo bin JEON
;
Yong Chul LEE
Author Information
- Publication Type:Original Article ; Comparative Study ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
- Keywords: Lung, interventional procedures; Radio-frequency ablation; Experimental study
- MeSH: Sodium Chloride/administration & dosage; Rabbits; Pulmonary Alveoli/pathology; Necrosis; Lung Neoplasms/surgery; Equipment Design; *Electrodes; Catheter Ablation/*instrumentation/methods; Animals
- From:Korean Journal of Radiology 2006;7(2):97-105
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
- Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To compare the effect of radio frequency ablation (RFA) on the dimensions of radio frequency coagulation necrosis in a rabbit lung using a wet electrode in monopolar mode with that in dual electrode bipolar mode at different infusion rates (15 mm/hr versus 30 ml/hr) and saline concentrations (0.9% normal versus 5.8% hypertonic saline) . MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty ablation zones (one ablation zone in each rabbit) were produced in 50 rabbits using one or two 16-guage wet electrodes with a 1-cm active tip. The RFA system used in the monopolar and dual electrode wet bipolar RFA consisted of a 375-kHz generator (Elektrotom HiTT 106, Berchtold, Medizinelektronik, Germany). The power used was 30 watts and the exposure time was 5 minutes. The rabbits were assigned to one of five groups. Group A (n = 10) was infused with 0.9% NaCl used at a rate of 30 ml/hr in a monopolar mode. Groups B (n = 10) and C (n = 10) were infused with 0.9% NaCl at a rate of 15 and 30 ml/hr, respectively in dual electrode bipolar mode; groups D (n = 10) and E (n = 10) were infused with 5.8% NaCl at a rate of 15 and 30 ml/hr, respectively in a dual electrode bipolar mode. The dimensions of the ablation zones in the gross specimens from the groups were compared using one-way analysis of variance by means of the Scheffe test (post-hoc testing). RESULTS: The mean largest diameter of the ablation zones was larger in dual electrode bipolar mode (30.9+/-4.4 mm) than in monopolar mode (22.5+/-3.5 mm). The mean smallest diameter of the ablation zones was larger in dual electrode bipolar mode (22.3+/-2.5 mm) than in monopolar mode (19.5+/-3.5 mm). There were significant differences in the largest and smallest dimension between the monopolar (group A) and dual electrode wet bipolar mode (groups B-E). In dual electrode bipolar mode, the mean largest diameter of the ablation zones was larger at an infusion rate of 15 ml/hr (34.2+/-4.0 mm) than at 30 ml/hr (27.6+/-0.1 mm), and the mean smallest diameter of the ablation zones was larger at an infusion rate of 15 ml/hr (27.2+/-7.5 mm) than at an infusion rate of 30 ml/hr (24+/-2.9 mm). CONCLUSION: Using a wet electrode, dual electrode bipolar RFA can create a larger ablation zone more efficiently than monopolar RFA.
