Is the Isolated-Tip Needle-Knife Precut as Effective as Conventional Precut Fistulotomy in Difficult Biliary Cannulation?.
- Author:
Tae Hoon LEE
1
;
Sang Heum PARK
;
Jae Kook YANG
;
Su Jung HAN
;
Suyeon PARK
;
Hyun Jong CHOI
;
Yun Nah LEE
;
Sang Woo CHA
;
Jong Ho MOON
;
Young Deok CHO
Author Information
- Publication Type:Comparative Study ; Original Article
- Keywords: Cannulation; Biliary; Precut; Iso-Tome; Needle-knife
- MeSH: Catheterization*; Humans; Needles; Pancreatitis
- From:Gut and Liver 2018;12(5):597-605
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
- Abstract: BACKGROUND/AIMS: Needle-knife precut fistulotomy (NK-F) is a well-known freehand technique for difficult biliary cannulation (DBC). Another approach involves the use of Iso-Tome®, a modified precutting device with an insulated needle tip to prevent direct thermal injury. This comparative study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the Iso-Tome® precut (IT-P) compared to that of NK-F for DBC. METHODS: Patients with a naive papilla who underwent early IT-P or NK-F for DBC were enrolled. DBC was defined as failure to achieve selective biliary access by wire-guided cannulation despite 5 minutes of attempted cannulation, ≥5 papillary contacts, or a hook-nose-shaped papilla. The primary endpoint was the primary technical success rate, which was based on a noninferiority model. RESULTS: A total of 239 DBC cases were enrolled. The primary technical success rates were 74.7% (89/119) in the IT-P group and 91.6% (110/120) in the NK-F group (lower limit of 90% confidence interval, −0.23; p=0.927 for a noninferiority margin of 10%). The total technical success rates were 87.4% and 95.0%, respectively (p=0.038). The mean precutting times for successful biliary access were 11.2 minutes for IT-P and 7.3 minutes for NK-F (p < 0.01). The procedure-related adverse event rates were 9.2% for IT-P and 5.8% for NK-F (p=0.318). The rates of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis were 4.2% and 2.5%, respectively (p=0.499). CONCLUSIONS: IT-P failed to exhibit noninferiority compared with NK-F regarding the primary technical success rate of DBC, but there was no difference in the frequency of adverse events.
