The Influence of Antiplatelet Drug Medication on Spine Surgery.
10.4055/cios.2018.10.3.380
- Author:
Won Shik SHIN
1
;
Dong Ki AHN
;
Jung Soo LEE
;
In Sun YOO
;
Ho Young LEE
Author Information
1. Department of Orthopedics, Seoul Sacred Heart General Hospital, Seoul, Korea. adk0208@hanmail.net
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Spinal surgery;
Antiplatelet drug;
Intraoperative bleeding;
Postoperative spinal epidural hematoma
- MeSH:
Aging;
Blood Platelets;
Cauda Equina;
Decompression;
Hematoma;
Hematoma, Epidural, Spinal;
Hemorrhage;
Humans;
Incidence;
Magnetic Resonance Imaging;
Partial Thromboplastin Time;
Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors;
Prothrombin Time;
Spine*
- From:Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery
2018;10(3):380-384
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: The incidence of cardiovascular and neurovascular diseases has been increasing with the aging of the population, and antiplatelet drugs (APDs) are more frequently used than in the past. With the average age of spinal surgery patients also increasing, there has been a great concern on the adverse effects of APD on spine surgery. To our knowledge, though there have been many studies on this issue, their results are conflicting. In this study, we aimed to determine the influence of APDs on spine surgery in terms of intraoperative bleeding and postoperative spinal epidural hematoma complication. METHODS: Patients who underwent posterior thoracolumbar decompression and instrumentation at our institution were reviewed. There were 34 APD takers (APDT group). Seventy-nine non-APD takers (NAPDT group) were selected as a control group in consideration of demographic and surgical factors. There were two primary endpoints of this study: the amount of bleeding per 10 minutes and cauda equina compression by epidural hematoma measured at the cross-sectional area of the thecal sac in the maximal compression site on the axial T2 magnetic resonance imaging scans taken on day 7. RESULTS: Both groups were homogeneous regarding age and sex (demographic factors), the number of fused segments, operation time, and primary/revision operation (surgical factors), and the number of platelets, prothrombin time, and activated partial thromboplastin time (coagulation-related factors). However, the platelet function analysis-epinephrine was delayed in the APDT group than in the NAPDT group (203.6 seconds vs. 170.0 seconds, p = 0.050). Intraoperative bleeding per 10 minutes was 40.6 ± 12.8 mL in the APDT group and 43.9 ± 9.9 mL in the NAPDT group, showing no significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.154). The cross-sectional area of the thecal sac at the maximal compression site by epidural hematoma was 120.2 ± 48.2 mm2 in the APDT group and 123.2 ± 50.4 mm2 in the NAPDT group, showing no significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.766). CONCLUSIONS: APD medication did not increase intraoperative bleeding and postoperative spinal epidural hematoma. Therefore, it would be safer to perform spinal surgery without discontinuation of APD therapy in patients who are vulnerable to cardiovascular and neurovascular complications.
