Beyond the Bifurcated Myth: The Medical Migration of Female Korean Nurses to West Germany in the 1970s.
10.13081/kjmh.2018.27.225
- Author:
Yong Suk JUNG
1
Author Information
1. Center for German and European Studies, Chung-Ang University, Korea. yongsuk.jung@gmail.com
- Publication Type:Electronic Supplementary Materials ; Original Article
- Keywords:
German dispatchment;
development aid;
Korean nurses and nurse-aides;
guest worker;
medical migration;
German Hospital Federation (DKG);
Korean Overseas Development Corporation (KODCO);
workforce drain;
bribery and corruption;
cultural misunderstanding
- MeSH:
Asia;
Commerce;
Delivery of Health Care;
Developing Countries;
Emigration and Immigration;
Fellowships and Scholarships;
Female*;
Germany*;
Health Care Sector;
Humans;
Korea;
Nursing;
Racism;
Theft;
Transients and Migrants
- From:Korean Journal of Medical History
2018;27(2):225-266
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
This study investigates beyond the bifurcated myth of the medical migration of Korean women to Germany in the 1970s, which is known as the “German dispatchment” myth from the Korean perspective and the “development aid” discourse from that of the Germans, by focusing on the newly-released documents from the German Hospital Federation (Deutsche Krankenhausgesellschaft, DKG). The migration was essentially a transfer of labor from a weak to a strong state, and the disparity of state strength characterized the nature of the recruitment mechanism. Both Korea and Germany have romanticized the labor transfer and appropriated the collective experiences of migrants for their own political purposes. In this transnational business, the Korean Overseas Development Corporation (KODCO) and the DKG maintained exclusivity in the labor migration channel and were faithful to their own interests. The DKG, as a representative of the German healthcare industry, was concerned about being criticized for destroying the healthcare system of developing countries by stealing their skilled workforce. They, therefore, tried to influence publicity in Korea and Germany to persuade the people that the recruitment benefited both countries. However, the DKG was aware of the deceitfulness of its “development aid” discourse. The Korean government, which advanced the labor export for the sake of obtaining foreign currency, romanticized it as patriotism and used the term “German dispatchment.” However, the incapacity and corruption of KODCO as an agency from the Korean perspective resulted in criticism regarding its recruitment program. The DKG complained that the selection of incapable personnel coupled with corruption was causing unforeseen financial damage to its member hospitals. Nevertheless, it officially defended its partner for the sake of its own interests, such as avoiding bad publicity and securing the sustainability of the recruitment program. The conflicts regarding nursing tasks and working conditions between Korean nurses and their German colleagues and employers captured in the documents of the DKG trace the origin of the issues in relation to cultural misunderstanding and pervasive racism. The disparity of state strength between the two countries resulted in the subaltern position of Korean female healthcare workers in the global labor market, and they tried to bring forth the best possible outcome while working in a foreign country in unfamiliar circumstances. However, the difficulties with female guest workers from Asia were generally credited to their inability to adhere to the German working style. This study contributes to the existing scholarship on this topic by filling the gaps. Historical research on the medical migration of Korean nurses and nurse-aides to West Germany has relied on limited historical sources. In 2013, the National Archives of Korea transferred official documents regarding these workers that were produced and archived by the DKG, which represented the interests of German healthcare institutions. Its documents on Korean nursing personnel provide supplementary information and display findings in different perspectives. They do not bring forth completely new findings that have never been researched before but are still valuable for delivering concrete evidence on the circumstances of that time, which were previously merely inferred.
