Breast augmentation surgery using an inframammary fold incision in Southeast Asian women: Patient-reported outcomes.
- Author:
Charles RANDQUIST
1
;
Yong Chen POR
;
Vincent YEOW
;
Joy MAGLAMBAYAN
;
Susan SIMONYI
Author Information
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords: Asia, Southeastern; Breast implants; Mammaplasty; Patient satisfaction
- MeSH: Asia, Southeastern; Asian Continental Ancestry Group*; Breast Implants; Breast*; Cicatrix; Contracture; Female; Humans; Mammaplasty; Nipples; Patient Satisfaction; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Reoperation; Retrospective Studies; Silicon; Silicones; Singapore
- From:Archives of Plastic Surgery 2018;45(4):367-374
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
- Abstract: BACKGROUND: This analysis presents patient-reported outcomes of breast augmentation procedures performed in Singapore using an inframammary fold incision and the “5 Ps” best practice principles for breast augmentation. These data are the first of their kind in Southeast Asian patients. METHODS: Through a retrospective chart review, patients who underwent primary breast augmentation with anatomical form-stable silicone gel breast implants using an inframammary fold incision were followed for ≥6 months postoperatively. The BREAST-Q Augmentation Module (scores standardized to 0 [worst] – 100 [best]) and Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS; 1 [normal skin] to 10 [worst scar imaginable]) were administered. Responses were summarized using descriptive statistics. Patient-reported events were collected. RESULTS: Twenty-two Southeast Asian patients (mean age, 35.1 years) completed ≥1 postoperative BREAST-Q and POSAS assessment and were assessed 11 months to 5.5 years postoperatively. The mean postoperative BREAST-Q satisfaction with breasts and psychosocial well-being scores were 69.2 and 84.0, respectively. The mean POSAS score for their overall opinion of the scar was 4.2; the mean scores for all scar characteristics ranged from 1.2 to 4.2. Over 90% of patients (20/22) said that they would recommend the procedure. Patient complaints following surgery included anisomastia (possibly pre-existing; n=2), sensory loss at the nipple (n=2) or around the nipple (n=3), scarring (n=4), and slight capsular contracture (n=1). No patients required reoperation. CONCLUSIONS: Southeast Asian patients reported high long-term satisfaction scores on the BREAST-Q scale and with their scar characteristics following breast augmentation using an inframammary fold incision, and nearly all said they would recommend this procedure. No reoperations were necessary in patients assessed for up to 5.5 years postoperatively.
