Patient's Cognitive Function and Attitudes towards Family Involvement in Cancer Treatment Decision Making: A Patient-Family Caregiver Dyadic Analysis.
- Author:
Dong Wook SHIN
1
;
Juhee CHO
;
Debra L ROTER
;
So Young KIM
;
Jong Hyock PARK
;
Hyung Kook YANG
;
Hyun Woo LEE
;
Sun Seog KWEON
;
Yune Sik KANG
;
Keeho PARK
Author Information
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords: Neoplasms; Family involvement; Cognitive function; Treatment decision; Caregivers
- MeSH: Aged; Caregivers*; Cognition Disorders; Cognition*; Decision Making*; Humans; Korea; Patient Education as Topic
- From:Cancer Research and Treatment 2018;50(3):681-690
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
- Abstract: PURPOSE: Older patient populations commonly have cognitive impairment, which might impact decisional capacity. We examined patients and family caregivers preferences for family involvement in treatment decision making assuming different level of cognitive impairment, and sought to explore the factors associated with the preferences and the degree to which patients and family members agree on preferences. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 358 elderly cancer patient and caregiver dyads were recruited from the 11 cancer centers in Korea andwere asked to express their preferences forfamily involvement in treatment decision making using hypothetical scenarios with three different levels of cognitive status (intact, mild impairment, and severe impairment). RESULTS: Both patients and family caregivers preferred greater family dominance in treatment decision makingwith the increasing the level of cognitive impairment (39.7%, 60.9%, and 86.6% for patients and 45.0%, 66.2%, and 89.7% for caregivers in each scenarios). Patient and family caregiver concordance in decisional control preference was small for all three scenarios (weighted κ=0.32, κ=0.26, and κ=0.36, respectively). Higher patient education was associated with preference for patient dominance in treatment decision in conditions of both mild and severe cognitive impairment. The association of higher patient education and patient-caregiver preference concordance was positive with intact cognition, while it was negative with severe cognitive impairment. CONCLUSION: Decision control preferences were affected by hypothesized cognitive status of the patients. Findings from our study would be helpful to develop effective strategy for optimizing family involvement in cancer treatment decision in the context of deteriorating cognitive function of the patients.
