Determinants of Potentially Unnecessary Cervical Cancer Screenings in American Women.
- Author:
Munseok SEO
1
;
James LANGABEER
Author Information
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords: Unnecessary procedures; Papanicolaou test; Hysterectomy; United States
- MeSH: Adult; Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U.S.); Cross-Sectional Studies; Female; Hispanic Americans; Humans; Hysterectomy; Insurance, Health; Marital Status; Mass Screening*; Methods; Multivariate Analysis; Odds Ratio; Papanicolaou Test; Retrospective Studies; United States; Unnecessary Procedures; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms*
- From:Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health 2018;51(4):181-187
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
- Abstract: OBJECTIVES: To identify factors responsible for potentially clinically unnecessary cervical cancer screenings in women with prior hysterectomy. METHODS: A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS). This study targeted adult women and examined whether they received a both a Papanicolaou (Pap) test and undergone a hysterectomy in the last three years. We conducted multivariate analyses, including weighted proportions and odds ratios (ORs), based on the modified BRFSS weighting method (raking). The inclusion criteria were adult women (>18 years old) who reported having received a Pap test within the last 3 years. RESULTS: Of all women (n=252 391), 72 366 had received a Pap test, and 32 935 of those women (45%, or 12.5 million, weighted) had a prior hysterectomy. We found that age, race/ethnicity, marital status, family income, health status, time since last routine checkup, and health insurance coverage were all significant predictors. Black, non-Hispanic women were 2.23 times more likely to receive Pap testing after a hysterectomy than white women (OR, 2.23; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.99 to 2.50). Similarly, the odds for Hispanic women were 2.34 times higher (OR, 2.34; 95% CI, 1.97 to 2.80). The odds were also higher for those who were married (OR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.08 to 1.27), healthier (OR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.14 to 1.35), and had health insurance (OR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.28 to 1.84), after controlling for confounders. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that women may potentially receive Pap tests even if they are not at risk for cervical cancer, and may not be adequately informed about the need for screenings. We recommend strategies to disseminate recommendations and information to patients, their families, and care providers.
